Friday, October 28, 2011

Compensating for something?

By BJ Bjornson

Something a little lighter to take you into the weekend.

This is a pretty silly argument, but it strikes me as part of an ongoing pattern of Conservatives looking for symbolic rather than practical ways to burnish Canada�s image.


A Conservative senator is urging the country to dump the iconic beaver in favour of the polar bear as an official emblem of Canada, saying the rodent has had its day.

. . .

�A country�s symbols are not constant and can change over time as long as they reflect the ethos of the people and the spirit of the nation.�

The senator said the polar bear is more noble and rugged.

�The polar bear is the world�s largest terrestrial carnivore and Canada�s most majestic and splendid mammal,� she said, noting it �survives in the harshest climate and terrain in the world.�


Personally, I�m for keeping the beaver. Not only is it the only other terrestrial mammal I�m aware of to build a structure visible from space, it is also far more likely to survive in the significantly warmer world that is rapidly destroying the polar bears� habitat. Something the Conservatives are doing nothing to prevent, if not outright looking to accelerate, and just may be another thing this little symbolic gesture is looking to compensate for.



1 comment:

  1. Living here in the Beaver State, Oregon, I'm kind of partial to the Beaver my self. Of course they are a pain in the a$$ when the block urban streams and flood neighbor hoods.

    ReplyDelete