By Libby
I'm not big on articles based entirely on anonymous sources but in this case, it seems justified. Considering that Hillary is still running an active campaign, Ms. Cottle allows her sources discretion appropriately in analyzing what went wrong on the path of inevitability . This quote pretty well nails where they went off track.
"There was not any plan in place from beginning to end on how to win the nomination. It was, 'Win Iowa.' There was not the experience level, and, frankly, the management ability, to create a whole plan to get to the magical delegate number. That to me is the number one thing. It's starting from that point that every subsequent decision resulted. The decision to spend x amount in Iowa versus be prepared for February 5 and beyond. Or how much money to spend in South Carolina--where it was highly unlikely we were going to win--versus the decision not to fund certain other states. ... It was not as simple as, 'Oh, that's a caucus state, we're not going to play there.' That suggests a more serious thought process. It suggests a meeting where we went through all that."
"Harold Ickes's encyclopedic understanding of the proportional delegate system was never operationalized into a field plan. The campaign inexplicably wrote off many states entirely, allowing Obama to create the lead of 100+ delegates that he has today. Most notably, we claimed the race would be over by February 5, but didn't devote any resources to the smaller states that day and in the weeks that followed, allowing Obama to easily run up margins and delegate counts on the cheap--the delegate margin he will win by."
We can argue all day and night about sexism and racism and all the other roadblocks on the path to the nomination, and all surely had an effect, but the bottom line is Obama simply outplanned Clinton. Everyone knew the rules of the game going in, and he used them to his advantage. If he was running against anyone besides Clinton, I have to think some of those who now argue that he doesn't deserve the nomination would be arguing the opposite and in fact might be praising his superior organizational abilities.
No comments:
Post a Comment