By Fester:
For the mechanics of geo-strategy if not its ethics, Machiavelli is not a bad place to start, especially when he talks about the unreliability of exiles... (quote lifted from Jumping to Conclusions)
"It ought to be considered, therefore, how vain are the faith and promises of those who find themselves deprived of their country.....As to their vain hopes and promises, such is the extreme desire in them to return home, that they naturally believe many things that are false and add many others by art, so that between those they believe and those they say they believe, they fill you with hope...
From Daniel Davies' 1 minute MBA:
- Fibbers' forecasts are worthless. Ron's post concerning McClatchey's fine reporting about Micheal Ledeen's willingness to be an idiot and a dupe.
- Good ideas do not need lots of lies told about them in order to gain public acceptance.
Those steely eyed, hard-hearted armchair warriors at AEI failed both of those tests. And I'm just pig-piling on
Defense Department counterintelligence investigators suspected that Iranian exiles who provided dubious intelligence on Iraq and Iran to a small group of Pentagon officials might have "been used as agents of a foreign intelligence service ... to reach into and influence the highest levels of the U.S. government," a Senate Intelligence Committee report said Thursday...Iran, which was a mortal enemy of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and fought a bloody eight-year war with Iraq during his reign, has been the primary beneficiary of U.S. policy in Iraq.....
The aborted counterintelligence investigation probed some Pentagon officials' contacts with Iranian exile Manucher Ghorbanifar, whom the CIA had labeled a "fabricator" in 1984. Those contacts were brokered by an American civilian, Michael Ledeen, a former Pentagon and National Security Council consultant and a leading advocate of invading Iraq and overthrowing Iran's Islamic regime.
It takes a lot of talent to fuck up this badly. It takes amazing stupidity to fail Machiavelli 101 while claiming you were both right and against the war at the same time while supplying the stove-piped intelligence into the propaganda campaign for the war. I'm impressed in a sick and sad sort of way, really I am.
The funny thing (not funny ha-ha) is that the Wolfowitzs and Feiths and Rumsfelds of the world were supposed to be the steely-eyed realists who know how the world really works and knows how to protect the county from the evil men. And the media went for that hook line and sinker
ReplyDeleteAs it turns out they were nothing more than arrested adolescents playing with their toy soldiers and military lingo in a cartoon world of their own devising.
The wingnuts have so far missed a golden opportunity to catapult a new war narrative for Iran: claim that, since the Iranians 'tricked' the US into destroying Iraq, the US should attack Iran to get even.
ReplyDeleteComing soon to a neocon propaganda house near you.