By Cernig
The Israeli Transport Minister - a member of Olmert's Kadima Party who was edged out for Defense Minister to make the coalition with Labour work - has said that Israel will certainly attack Iran if it "continues with its program for developing nuclear weapons". Both the IAEA and US intelligence agree that there is no evidence of Iran having a nuclear weapons program at the present time.
"If Iran continues with its program for developing nuclear weapons, we will attack it. The sanctions are ineffective," Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz told the mass-circulation Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper.
"Attacking Iran, in order to stop its nuclear plans, will be unavoidable," said the former army chief who has also been defense minister.
...Mofaz's remarks came as he and several other senior members of Olmert's Kadima Party prepare for a possible run for top office should a corruption scandal force the Israeli prime minister to step down.
Iranian-born Mofaz has been a main party rival of the Israeli prime minister, particularly following the 2006 elections when Olmert was forced to hand the defense portfolio to Labour, his main coalition partner, at Mofaz's expense.
Mofaz, who is also designated as a deputy prime minister, has remained privy to Israel's defense planning. He is a member of Olmert's security cabinet and leads regular strategic coordination talks with the U.S. State Department.
This is the strongest ever statement of beligerent intent from the Israeli government, and comes from a deputy PM who may well soon be prime minister. The US hard right base that McCain is playing to on foreign policy, of course, love it.
It's worth remembering that any Israeli attack on Iran would almost certainly have to cross Iraqi airspace - which would require at least high-level US approval as well as probably involving US targeting and logistical support. The blowback in Iraq and the wider region would be immense.
Belligerent, yes. It also happens to be in direct violation of the UN Charter, Article II,
ReplyDeleteAll Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state,
and the Nuremberg Principles VI(a), Crimes Against Peace:
(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
These violations are notable because,
Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law.
In a nominally functional international framework, Israel and her officials should be facing trial in the Hague right now.