By Cernig
BJ flagged this one up for me, and it really does deserve attention - an interview with Afghan president Hamid Karzai for Der Speigel. The whole thing is worth a read, but here's the bit that stood out for me.
SPIEGEL: Dirty deals are still necessary for the stability of Afghanistan?
Karzai: Absolutely necessary, because we lack the power to solve these problems in other ways. What do you want? War? Let me give you an example. We wanted to arrest a really terrible warlord, but we couldn't do it because he is being protected by a particular country. We found out that he was being paid $30,000 a month to stay on his good side. They even used his soldiers as guards �
SPIEGEL: That sounds like the story of Commander Nasir Mohammed in Badakhshan, a province where German soldiers are based.
Karzai: I don't want to name the country because it will hurt a close friend and ally. But there are also many other countries who contract the Afghan militias and their leaders. So I can only work where I can act, and I must always calculate what will happen before doing anything.
The outgoing US commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, General Dan McNeill, has said it would take 400,000 troops to adequately cover that country according to US COIN doctrine (the manual famously steered by David Petreaus). He's also bluntly said that "This is an under-resourced war" during the handover ceremony in which he passed command to General David McKiernan. That's why Afghanistan is now more dangerous for US forces than Iraq.
The Bush legacy - and McCain's plan - for the true central front in the fight against Islamic extremist terrorism is simply this...Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap.
No comments:
Post a Comment