By Ron Beasley
We all know that the so called fact finding trips to Iraq by politicians are little more than taxpayer funded photo ops at a dog and pony show. That said it appears that Barack Obama may be forced to make such a trip to shut up John McCain. Juan Cole has some excellent advise on how to turn it into a real fact finding mission and at the same time make it backfire on McCain and the neocons.
See if a meeting can be set up with Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani. Sistani has enormous moral authority in Iraq and is known for his support for national unity. No one could slam Obama for meeting with the Grand Ayatollah. Paul Bremer corresponded with him. He is not a radical and is well respected by the US military. And, when Obama comes to debate McCain, the Grand Ayatollah would give him a trump card. "Senator McCain speaks of having US bases in Iraq for a hundred years. Grand Ayatollah Sistani and other key Iraqi leaders told me to my face that any such plans are completely unacceptable to them. How likely is it that the McCain fatwa can be more popular or legitimate in Iraq than the Sistani fatwa?"
Sistani doesn't meet many foreigners. But he has met UN special envoys and a wide range of politicians. It isn't beyond the realm of possibility that he would meet Obama. Providing security in Najaf could be done. US Ambassador Ryan Crocker was in Najaf recently. Abdul Aziz al-Hakim could set it up and help guarantee it.
He also recommends a trip to Jordan to meet with the half million Iraqi refugees in that country which would bring some visibility to that aspect of the occupation and civil war.
What Obama should do (that phrase again) is do that political jiu-jitsu at which he excels, and take a trip to Afghanistan instead, putting a big fat line under his commitment to OEF while tying McCain to Iraq.
ReplyDeleteBut if he does this Billy Kristol will call him names in a NYT's op-ed. Besides, the truth from Sistani isn't like a walk through at the carpet bazaar.
ReplyDelete