Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Taken For A Ride?

By Ron Beasley



Over the last seven and a half years the Bush administration has looked stupid and incompetent, have been secretive and deceitful and have been unwilling to look at anything that doesn't fit their pre-conceived notion of reality.  Now we already know they were taken for a ride by Ahmad Chalabi and his band of crooks - remember Chalabi turned out to be an Iranian spy but was there even more?



Did Iranian agents dupe Pentagon officials?

WASHINGTON � Defense Department counterintelligence investigators suspected that Iranian exiles who provided dubious intelligence on Iraq and Iran to a small group of Pentagon officials might have "been used as agents of a foreign intelligence service ... to reach into and influence the highest levels of the U.S. government," a Senate Intelligence Committee report said Thursday.



A top aide to then-secretary of defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, however, shut down the 2003 investigation into the Pentagon official's activities after only a month, and Defense Department officials never followed up on investigators' recommendation for a more thorough investigation, the Senate report said.



The revelation raises questions about whether Iran may have used a small cabal of officials in the Pentagon and in Vice President Dick Cheney's office to feed bogus intelligence on Iraq and Iran to senior policymakers in the Bush administration who were eager to oust the Iraqi dictator.



Iran, which was a mortal enemy of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and fought a bloody eight-year war with Iraq during his reign, has been the primary beneficiary of U.S. policy in Iraq, where Iranian-backed groups now run much of the government and the security forces.

So was was Iran using as a funnel for mis-information?  None other that neocon nutcase and Cheney favorite  Michael Ledeen.

The aborted counterintelligence investigation probed some Pentagon officials' contacts with Iranian exile Manucher Ghorbanifar, whom the CIA had labeled a "fabricator" in 1984. Those contacts were brokered by an American civilian, Michael Ledeen, a former Pentagon and National Security Council consultant and a leading advocate of invading Iraq and overthrowing Iran's Islamic regime.



According to the Senate report, the Pentagon's Counterintelligence Field Activity unit concluded in 2003 that Ledeen "was likely unwitting of any counterintelligence issues related to his relationship with Mr. Ghorbanifar."



The counterintelligence unit said, however, that Ledeen's association with Ghorbanifar "was widely known, and therefore it should be presumed other foreign intelligence services, including those of Iran, would know."



Stephen Cambone, then the undersecretary of defense for intelligence, shut down the counterintelligence investigation after only a month, the Senate report said.



The Senate report said that Pentagon officials never followed up on the investigators' recommendation for a comprehensive analysis of whether Ghorbanifar or his associates tried "to directly or indirectly influence or access U.S. government officials."



The counterintelligence investigators recommended that U.S. officials attempt "to map Ghorbanifar's relationship within Iranian elite social networks and, if possible, his contacts with other governments and/or intelligence organizations," but that effort was never undertaken.

It been pretty obvious for some time that the ultimate winner in Iraq will be and in fact already is Iran.  Did Iran set up the delusional nut cases in the in the Bush administration to take out their arch enemy, Saddam, and put their Shiite friends in charge of the country?  It certainly looks like it.



Update



Thanks to commentor Clive there is an update above.



7 comments:

  1. Give me a break. Just another attempt to blame everything on IRAN. More nonsense to justify War with Iran. Sickening. And people will believe it!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, that is priceless!
    I reckon this goes all the way to the top. Dick Cheney is a mole working under deep cover for the Iranians.
    http://www.exile.ru/articles/detail.php?ARTICLE_ID=8565&IBLOCK_ID=35

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ledeen "was likely unwitting..."
    And most of the time, I'll venture.
    Yeah, what is the IO here? It is hard to tell if op is meant to implicate Iran or the White House for being stooges. It does both, of course. But like Chalabi, i doubt that Gorbanifar worked for the Iranian government. These guys are usually in it for themselves. Chalabi certainly was.
    And let's all face it, Cheney could have held a rock to his ear and he would have been certain that that intelligence confirmed that Saddam had WMD and ties to al Qaeda. This White House didn't need convincing, they needed a source so that they could then turn around and claim the intelligence was flawed. They did this in the case of Iraq/al Qaeda ties when they used confessions and "testimony" extracted by torture. Using unreliables like Chalabi and Gorbanifar served their purposes perfectly. The White House was not being "duped" and for McClatchy to even suggest it is ridiculous.
    Ledeen, of course, is another story.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Everybody is getting this one wrong.
    The "foreign intelligence service" in question is likely not Iran, but Israel.
    Ghorbanifar's connection to the Iran/Contra transactions (which of course included Israel to Iran arms shipments) should probably be taken into account.
    Iranian agents of the Israeli intelligence services are not as rare as one would think.
    And besides, nobody has ventured an explanation of why the U.S. didn't get better intelligence on Iraq's WMD from their longtime ally Israel (who are supposed to be on top of such matters) in the run-up to the war.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What Clive said. Ghorbanifar reeks of double agent.
    Regards, C

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow Clive
    That hadn't occured to me but it sure makes sense.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The "foreign intelligence service" that pushed for the war by promoting bogus intelligence could just as easily have been Israel's intelligence service (which, according to Israeli general Shlomo Brom, was "exaggerating the Iraqi threat" to push the US into attacking Iraq) as well as the Italian intelligence service SISMI (US intelligence agencies received several reports from the Italian intelligence service SISMI of a supposed agreement between Iraq and Niger for the sale of yellowcake uranium)
    The whole idea that Bush was misled by "bogus intelligence" into invading Iraq is itself totally bogus -- the "Uranium from Niger" documents were known to be crude forgeries, and the Bushites simply did not care and cited it anyway. Bush had always planned on invading Iraq, whether there were any WMDs or not.

    ReplyDelete