By Steve Hynd
John Bolton takes to the pages of the WSJ to advocate for allowing, nay encouraging, Israel to attack Iran. (No really, you don't say?)
Bolton's arguments boil down to: Do it soon, everything will be OK. There's a slam-dunk intelligence case for the threat, the war itself will be a cakewalk and we'll be greeted as liberators.
Amazing. I just saw the last eight years flash before my eyes.
ROFL
ReplyDeleteHe is insane. By his own admission, the most likely reaction would be Iran fueling Hamas and Hezbollah to attack Israel - battle by proxy. So Israel ought to pre-emptively strike Hamas and Hezbollah? Yeah, right. Israel's attacks against the same really did a lot of good in 2006 and 2008. Because why wouldn't every Muslim in the Middle East want to rise up and flood Israel with stones, firearms, and rockets if that happened?
ReplyDeleteWhen somebody has reached a certain age and is challenged by something he/she hasn't dealt with before there is the question of whether 'an old dog can still learn a new trick'.
ReplyDeleteWhat Bolton's WSJ piece simply tell us, is that this dog is too old to learn any new tricks.
You have to give this man credit. Neither facts nor logic nor history nor fundamental human decency stays this buffoon from the swift completion of his appointed talk show circuit.
ReplyDelete