By Fester:
The Associated Press is about to launch their content seeking bots and continue their descent into minimal relevance according to Ars Technica.
The AP is seeking to prevent 'exploitation' of their content which is usually some of the most generic thing out there; basic information with minimal analysis and value add past the point of a national and international distribution system.
The problem with the AP attempting to firewall their content from re-appropriation from micro-users is that there is very little differentiating content in their work that I and many other bloggers can not find elsewhere.
Agence France Press, Reuters, UPI, CNN, New York Times all do an excellent job of running down the basic facts of most scenarios, situations and events that I am interested in. If the AP hassles me, or more likely poses a credible threat of hassling me, it is not worth my time to seek out and link their work when it is mostly undifferentiated information with minimal analytical value add compared to the other options that are available. I think this policy and my probable response will be replicated by the legions of bloggers with decent audiences but low revenue streams. This is a good way for me, and many other information and opinion leaders to start ignoring and devaluing AP members. And then the death spiral of tying together information gathering, analysis and distribution as a business model will continue.
Fester, they won't even admit that the Scott Roeder who killed George Tiller is the same Scott Roeder who got busted in 1996 for having bomb making materials in his car. (I blogged about it this morning.)
ReplyDeleteWith crack investigative reporting like that, who needs 'em?