Commentary By Ron Beasley
Is the author of this "insight" from the Investor's Business Daily a liar or just plain stupid? (via Jay Bookman)
The U.K.'s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) basically figures out who deserves treatment by using a cost-utility analysis based on the "quality adjusted life year."
One year in perfect health gets you one point. Deductions are taken for blindness, for being in a wheelchair and so on.
The more points you have, the more your life is considered worth saving, and the likelier you are to get care.
People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn't have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless.
The problem of course is that Stephen Hawking was born in the UK and has lived there his entire life. He has also lived much longer than most victims of neuro muscular dystrophy.
Now I can see them telling a lie like that on FOX, their viewers wouldn't know any better. But I would think the readers of IBD would know better. So I will assume that the author is just too stupid to be taken seriously.
No comments:
Post a Comment