Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, August 24, 2009

How The Republicans Destroyed The Economy

Commentary By Ron Beasley

In the 50s 60s and early 70s the US had two things, a strong and growing economy and a strong and growing middle class.  It is no coincidence that when Ronald Reagan and the Republicans set out to destroy the middle class they also destroyed the economy for most Americans.  The income of the middle class continued to decline but US business still needed for them to spend even though they had less income.  To keep the economy going Alan Greenspan flooded the economy with credit which lead to the current economic crisis.  The Republicans continue to push policies that will reduce wages.  In a column today Thom Hartmann brings us this.

Reagan also put into the chairmanship of the Fed Alan Greenspan, who
openly declared that his most important job as chairman of the Fed was
to prevent �wage inflation� � a term which he exclusively applied to
working-class people. Greenspan is still preaching that now-discredited
and anti-American philosophy he learned from Ayn Rand, in fact.


Having already largely wiped out the ability of a blue-collar
single-wage-earner family to have a middle class lifestyle over the
past 30 years, Greenspan now wants to go after white-collar workers by
eliminating limits on H1B visas for skilled workers ranging from
computer programmers to physicians to scientists. The investor class
would always be protected, in the Greenspan world, but the working
class � regardless of skill level � should always be the working poor.


In September of 2007, in an interview on C-SPAN for Book TV, Greenspan said:

�We pay the highest skilled labor wages in the world. If we would open
up our borders to skilled labor far more than we do, we would attract a
very substantial quantity of skilled labor which would suppress the
wage levels of the skilled, because the skilled are essentially being
subsidized by the government, meaning our competition is being kept
outside the country.�

Hartmann then explains that to repair the economy we need to do just the opposite - increase wages.  If the middle class has more income they will spend it stimulating the economy in the process,

One of the most powerful forms of stimulus we could apply to our
economy right now would be to lower the current Social Security
retirement age from the current 65-67 to 55, and increase the benefits
back to where they were in inflation-adjusted 1960s dollars by raising
them between 10 to 20 percent (so people could actually live, albeit
modestly, on Social Security).

The right-wing reaction to this, of course, will be to say
that with fewer people working and more people drawing benefits, it
would bankrupt Social Security and destroy the economy. But history
shows the exact reverse.


Instead, it would eliminate the problem of unemployment in
the United States. All those Boomers retiring would make room in the
labor market for all the recent high-school and college graduates who
are now finding it so hard to find a job.

If enough Boomers left the job market, it would even flip
the current dynamic of too-many-people-chasing-too-few-jobs upside
down, and create a tight labor markets. Tight labor markets drive up
wages.


And as wages go up, tax revenues � which are paying for Social Security (among other things) � would increase.


Additionally, these new-into-the-workforce people can then pay
off student loans, buy new houses and cars, and otherwise drive the
economy from the bottom up. Which will further increase tax revenues
further strengthening the Social Security system.



2 comments:

  1. Ron, I just learned last week that it was Alan Greenspan who headed the National Commission on Social Security Reform (prior to being appointed to the Fed) "to investigate what changes to federal law were necessary to shore up the fiscal health of the Social Security program. In addition to recommending tax increases to alleviate the short-term funding problem, the Greenspan Commission projected that the system would be solvent for the entirety of its 75-year forecast period."
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Security_Trust_Fund
    About the same time the so-called Trust Fund was established which allowed that surplus to be pissed away as general revenue spending, replaced by special "bonds" to be redeemed when the time comes. Compare a second home mortgage, or borrowing against retirement savings.
    Every time I think about how that surplus over the last two decades has been spent it makes me angry. Social Security isn't "going broke" in 2017 any more than the mortgage holder with a balloon payment. All we have to do is make the payment, right?
    (The way out, clearly, is tweaking the taxable cap to clean up the mess for another generation or two. So get ready for the crocodile tears from the silver spoons set.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. ___________
    Tel Aviv, Friday, 28th August 2009.
    The Puzzle of The Crash and The Sacrifice of Gilaad Shalit.
    In this article I tell that The Crash will take place on Friday, 18nth September 2009 at 4:11 PM EST.
    The reading of that article is of the uttermost importance for everyone.
    It is even more important to the Islamic and Jewish people, the sons of Abraham.
    It presents the causes and consequences of The Crash.
    It proves that Ben 'Systemic Risk' Bernanke engineered deliberately the Great Recession and is preparing The Next Crash
    For Eid ul-Fitr the Hamas will sacrifice Gilaad Shalit.
    Tell the new to the world and free Gilad Shalit on 4th September 2009 at 5:58 Jerusalem Time and everything will be fine for example.
    Some of you may be shocked by the videos and their wordings. Please don't watch them.
    The Puzzle of The Crash and The Sacrifice of Gilaad Shalit.
    ___________

    ReplyDelete