Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, August 9, 2009

No Win?

Commentary By Ron Beasley


When Sonia Sotomayor was sworn in yesterday it was a double loss for the Republicans.  Yes, by opposing her the all but eliminated any possibility they could get a piece of the growing hispanic pie but just as important by opposing a middle of the road nominee with corporate leanings they also eliminated any possibility of having any input when Obama makes his next selection(s).  The result will be nominees further to the left.


I have seen the health care debate as another no win for the Republicans.  David Frum agrees:



What would it mean to �win� the health care fight?


For some, the answer is obvious: beat back the president�s proposals, defeat the House bill, stand back and wait for 1994 to repeat itself.


The problem is that if we do that� we�ll still have the present healthcare system. Meaning that we�ll have (1) flat-lining wages, (2) exploding Medicaid and Medicare costs and thus immense pressure for future tax increases, (3) small businesses and self-employed individuals priced out of the insurance market, and (4) a lot of uninsured or underinsured people imposing costs on hospitals and local governments.


We�ll have entrenched and perpetuated some of the most irrational features of a hugely costly and under-performing system, at the expense of entrepreneurs and risk-takers, exactly the people the Republican party exists to champion.


Not a good outcome.


Even worse will be the way this fight is won: basically by convincing older Americans already covered by a government health program, Medicare, that Obama�s reform plans will reduce their coverage. In other words, we�ll have sent a powerful message to the entire political system to avoid at all hazards any tinkering with Medicare except to make it more generous for the already covered.


If we win, we�ll trumpet the success as a great triumph for liberty and individualism. Really though it will be a triumph for inertia. To the extent that anybody in the conservative world still aspires to any kind of future reform and improvement of America�s ossified government, that should be a very ashy victory indeed.


The current health care system is broken and becoming more dysfunctional every day.  As the economy improves and people return to work more and more of them are going to find their new jobs don't include health insurance and for many if not most purchasing their own insurance won't be an option.  In one, two or three years the pressure for reform will be so great that Obama's current proposal will look like unbridled free enterprise - yes, the pressure will grow for single payer.


Of course Mr Frum is indeed a voice in the wilderness, Just read this and this.


I for one would rather see no health care bill this year than a watered down bi-partisan one.  Things are only going to get worse which improves the odds of a good solution.



2 comments:

  1. "I for one would rather see no health care bill this year than a watered down bi-partisan one. Things are only going to get worse which improves the odds of a good solution." No bill? In another 10 years, we can have the same fight all over again... after a 2012-2020 Republican presidency. The Republicans will learn that goon tactics win. You will be able to write the definitive book titled "The Triumph of the Paranoid Style in American Politics (2009-2020)." I need a nap.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If we get a bi-partisan bill that does little to fix the problem we will be back in 10 years fighting the same battle. If we get no bill at all this time around it will only be a year or two.

    ReplyDelete