By Steve Hynd
My friend Derrick Crowe noticed that US officials are now using the words "Afghanistan" and "Vietnam" in the same breath.
Top U.S. officials have reached out to a leading Vietnam war scholar to discuss the similarities of that conflict 40 years ago with American involvement in Afghanistan, where the U.S. is seeking ways to isolate an elusive guerrilla force and win over a skeptical local population.
The overture to Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Stanley Karnow, who opposes the Afghan war, comes as the U.S. is evaluating its strategy there.
�When asked what could be drawn from the Vietnam experience, Karnow replied: �What did we learn from Vietnam? We learned that we shouldn�t have been there in the first place. Obama and everybody else seem to want to be in Afghanistan, but not I.�
Derrick writes: "Here�s a tip for policymakers: if you�re in a situation that�s requiring you to look to the American experience in VIetnam for guidance, you should start looking for the door."
No comment as yet on this news from neoliberal interventionist Peter Bergen, who took to the pages of the Washington Monthly recently to argue that Afghanistan wasn't anything like Vietnam. The folk at the White House made him look a fool inside a month.
(Guy Saperstein's answer to Bergen's op-ed is here.)
it took the russians what 10 years to get out of an unwinnable situation. we are going 8 years....
ReplyDeleteWith 54% already opposing the war the Democrats won't put up with Obama's folly much longer.
ReplyDelete