Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Saturday, August 15, 2009

Were You Wrong If The Press Doesn't Think So?

Commentary By Ron Beasley


Now we have all noted that too many of the personalities on cable TV and to many of the pundits on the opinion pages were members or cheer leaders for the failed Bush/Cheney administration.  We have also noted that many of the old Republican/Conservative guard is not real happy with the current crop of wingnuts that make up what is now known as the Republican party. One member of that old guard is Bruce Bartlett.  Now I agree with Bartlett on virtually nothing - but for all his other short commings he is at least sane.  He had a piece over at The Daily Beast the other day, The GOP's Misplaced Rage:



In January, the Congressional Budget Office projected a deficit this year of $1.2 trillion before Obama took office, with no estimate for actions he might take. To a large extent, the CBO�s estimate simply represented the $482 billion deficit projected by the Bush administration in last summer�s budget review, plus the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, which George W. Bush rammed through Congress in September over strenuous conservative objections. Thus the vast bulk of this year�s currently estimated $1.8 trillion deficit was determined by Bush�s policies, not Obama�s.


I think conservative anger is misplaced. To a large extent, Obama is only cleaning up messes created by Bush. This is not to say Obama hasn�t made mistakes himself, but even they can be blamed on Bush insofar as Bush�s incompetence led to the election of a Democrat. If he had done half as good a job as most Republicans have talked themselves into believing he did, McCain would have won easily.


But on Saturday Steve Benen published an email he received from Bartlett:



I believe that political parties should do penance for their mistakes and just losing power is not enough. Part of that involves understanding why those mistakes were made and how to prevent them from happening again. Republicans, however, have done no penance. They just pretend that they did nothing wrong. But until they do penance they don't deserve any credibility and should be ignored until they do. That's what my attacks on Bush are all about. I want Republicans to admit they were wrong about him, accept blame for his mistakes, and take some meaningful action to keep them from happening again. Bush should be treated as a pariah, as Richard Nixon was for many years until he rebuilt his credibility by more or less coming clean about Watergate with David Frost and writing a number of thoughtful books.

One reason this isn't happening is because the media don't treat Republicans as if they are discredited. On the contrary, they often seem to be treated as if they have more credibility than the administration. Just look at the silly issue of death panels. The media should have laughed it out the window, ridiculed it or at least ignored it once it was determined that there was no basis to the charge. Instead, those making the most outlandish charges are treated with deference and respect, while those that actually have credibility on the subject are treated as equals at best and often with deep skepticism, as if they are the ones with an ax to grind.


I am truly baffled by this situation, as I'm sure you are.


I am truly baffled that Bruce Bartlett is baffled that "the media don't treat Republicans as if they are discredited. On the contrary, they often seem to be treated as if they have more credibility than the administration". There is little actual news media anymore. We have tabloid journalism - town halls with loud and crazy protesters make for better TV than constructive ones.  We don't have news anchors anymore - we have millionaire talking heads that go to the same country clubs and cocktail parties as the people they are supposed to be reporting on. 



2 comments:

  1. Ron,
    Your conclusion is a bullseye.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Media behavior is much better described through the class interest angle rather than the tabloid journalism angle. The media does like conflict, but there is no doubt that the death-to-children astroturf movement gets far more favorable coverage than a hypothetical band of organized screamers in favor of single payer ever would.
    The media supports Republican interests because the Republican party best represents the ideology of media executives and senior talking heads, not because the Republicans are merely better at putting screaming lunatics in front of TV cameras.

    ReplyDelete