By Dave Anderson:
Good behavior should be rewarded, bad behavior should be made expensive and unpleasant. This is basic operant conditioning. This is basic political incentives, and it is almost a tautology of economics --- you get what you pay for --- but it is an incentive structure that is not always present in American politics, so we get lots of bad behavior as that is where the incentives lie.
Being dumb and saying dumb things is something that the American political system should have strong electoral incentives against. We saw that in 2008 with massive Democratic fundraising against Michelle Bachman in MN-6, and Repubilcan fundraising against John Murtha in PA-12. Neither effort was successful in beating incumbents, but each effort significantly increased the cost (both monetarily and hassle wise) for incumbents who previously were seen as highly probable to win re-election without too much effort.
It looks like Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC) is seeing this same anti-douchebaggery incentive applied to him, as his opponent now is better funded as of this afternoon than he was at any point in the 2008 cycle. Daily Kos has the numbers:
Overall, Rob Miller is close to hitting $400,000....Note, Miller raised $340K from individual donations ALL of 2008. He's beaten that in 18 hours. And going into the last reporting period, Wilson had $180,000 cash on hand. Those two words -- which have now cost Wilson nearly $200,000 each -- have utterly shifted the ground in this district.
Money is not everything in an election; otherwise we would have seen Rudi Guiliani or Mitt Romney as the Republican nominee, and we would never have seen Rep. Carol Porter-Shea (D-NH), but it sure does help. Wilson has seen his 2010 race going from strongly favoring him to being a probable fiscal slug-fest where he'll need to kiss babies and asses for the next 58 weeks to win re-election instead of just cruising to re-election.
No comments:
Post a Comment