Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Career Building With Low Risk Conflicts?

By Steve Hynd


In a recent interview with Michael Hastings, COIN-skeptic Colonel Douglas Macgregor attacked the "safe" mentality of the current generation of generals:



What the generals have today Afghanistan and Iraq, they like. There is no maneuver. You move in, you have a very weak adversary, you set up a base, and you do operations from the base. Your enemy has no armor, no artillery, no air force. You are able to go where you like and do what you like. There are no high risk maneuvers. There are no exceptionally agile or dangerous enemies that can put your forces in complete risk. This is not 1950�the 8th Army is not in danger of being overrun by the North Koreans or the Chinese. The generals are much more comfortable with static light infantry warfare against a weak adversary that drags on for years because it is low risk for them.


...I didn�t say it made sense, or that it was in the strategic interest of the American people. But the generals like it because it�s something they can manage and control, at least in their minds. If you have a temporary problem you bring more firepower to bear on an enemy that has no means of defending itself... These are things the generals are comfortable with. They�re not looking at strategic outcomes. There is no strategy, in both cases.


This, to me, sounds very close to outright accusing Petraeus et al of talking the U.S. into long COIN occupations because they are a cushy way to feather their careers with "combat" commands while never actually facing a real risk of losing. What do you think?



4 comments:

  1. Deep down inside Petraeus is a political hack. This has been obvious since he first came unto the scene.

    ReplyDelete
  2. and don't forget the endless $$$$$$ flowing from the usa taxpayers into the defense industry coffers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The nature and character of David Petraeus was readily apparent the day he wrote the op-ed for George W. Bush just prior to the 2004 election.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "The problem is, people mistake the weakness of these Islamic societies as opportunity for development. They don�t understand you cannot drag a billion people in the Islamic world through the Reformation, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the French Revolution and the Industrial Revolution in just a few years, install U.S. concepts of governance and expect them to embrace it and maintain it. Not just in Iraq but also in Afghanistan."
    I've been saying this for years, the ME is an artificial construct created by the Turks and the Brits, the population needs a century on its own to sort out what they are. Instead of defining themselves as against the west.

    ReplyDelete