By Dave Anderson:
I have become a Pirates quasi-fan by osmosis. It is hard to beat 9 bucks for a decent major league game in the cheap seats, cheap beer, and cheap food. At that price point, a baseball game is a direct substitute for a movie night as the movies are ten bucks to get in, expensive food and also roughly 2.5 hours of entertainment. As a quasi-Pirates fan, I am used to losing. I'm actively looking forward to "Futility Day" when the Pirates clinch their record setting 17th straight losing season.
The Pirates are able to lose close games, they are able to lose big, they are able to lose creatively, and they are able to lose conventionally. When the Pirates have played several games in a row that have eaten up their bull-pen due to either starter ineffectiveness, high pitch counts, or extra innings and then face a good team that jumps out to a 7-1 first innning lead. This happens fairly frequently. At that point, the correct decision is to think about the future, and keep the starting pitcher on the mound for as long as possible even if he is ineffective. The goal at that point is to save the bullpen, and allow for the higher probability of future wins because the bullpen is fresh. The short term consequence is a burned-out starter and a loss, but that loss was highly likely anyways.
What is the consequence of the US declaring victory in Afghanistan, as we accomplished one of the original objectives of disrupting and/or destroying the training camps run and supported by Al-Quaeda as well as force their leadership into hiding or continual promotion and propogation of more #3 guys? What happens if the Taliban, and Pashtun tribal militias assert their dominance in their heartland and pay continual lip-service to any government in Kabul that they do not dominate? Does taking a short term "loss" of face improve long run US security probabilities? I think this is a possibility that we need to debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment