Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Friday, October 23, 2009

Iran Fails To Accept Draft Deal (Updated)

By Steve Hynd


News agencies are reporting that Iran has failed to accept the IAEA's draft deal and has instead made a counteroffer to buy the medium-enriched fuel it needs for its research reactor. Obviously, that's a non-starter for the other parties to these talks, as it would mean Iran's existing uranium stockpile would remain intact.


I'm very disappointed over this news - I honestly thought Iran would accept, given the signals its negotiating team were sending. But I'm not sure this is the end of the story. Iran hawks in the West will want it to be, and I expect unPresident McCain and the rest to renew their calls for crippling sanctions and bombing campaigns on today's news shows, saying that it shows Iran is untrustable and is just playing for time.


That would be one interpretation and right now I'm not so sure that they're wrong as I usually am. But another would be that the other parties' insistence that France be included in the draft deal is what sank it. France has been very hawkish in its public pronouncements about Iran, as much so as the old Bush administration or Israel. Given that, Iran's negotiation team made it very clear that their nation did not regard France as a trustable partner for any deal and now their superiors have made it clear they don't think so either.


It's possible that the IAEA deal is rescuable if France is taken out and another nation with similiar fuel-rod fabrication abilities - Argentina, for instance - is put in. Whether the IAEA and the various nations around the table will even try that remains to be seen.


I often get the nasty feeling that trying to play high-stakes poker with a haggling culture is a losing proposition for both.


Update: niacINsight writes:



We�re hearing more and more that the reports about Iran �turning down� the proposed deal are unofficial, and as such should be treated with a very healthy dose of skepticism.  Iran�s official response is still pending, though it appears Tehran might try to prolong the deadline for a yes or no answer to next week.


The Obama administration acknowledged that they are only interested in Iran�s official response last night in the State Department�s daily press briefing with spokesman Ian Kelly:



I�m sure there are a lot of voices in Tehran right now, but we�re going to wait for that authoritative answer tomorrow.


Update 2: And here we go -  Iran will give an answer next week. That really does look like it's just playing silly buggers. Damn. The thing is, I still don't think Iran is "playing for time" so they can build a nuke. I think it's a fundamental disconnect between bargaining cultures.



1 comment:

  1. It doesn't matter if Iran agrees or not, as they well know. The level of proof needed to placate the US/Israel is greater than infinity. Ask Saddam.

    ReplyDelete