By BJ Bjornson
I suppose you have to file this one under the �truth is funnier than parody� column. The makers of Conservapedia, whose mission has been to offset the well-known liberal bias of Wikipedia, (and also most everything else in the real world), have noticed that the founding document of Christianity reads like it was written by some long-haired hippy dude and have decided
to correct the oversight.
Their examples of this liberal bias are quite instructive. The first posits that Jesus asking his father to forgive his persecutors might be a liberal corruption of the original. After all, if that Jesus fellow was really into forgiveness, how would you go about justifying all that vengeance, smiting of foes, and capital punishment?
I�m going to go out on a limb here and guess that there aren�t a lot of red-letter Christians in conservapedia circles.
Under the advantages of this project:
this would debunk the pervasive and hurtful myth that Jesus would be a political liberal today
Yup. No way that a guy who went around offering free health care to the sick, spoke of compassion and forgiveness, and had some mean things to say about rich men�s chances of getting into heaven, (all clearly examples of blatant liberal tampering with the text), would have anything in common with the liberals of today.
At least, he won�t when they�re through �re-translating� what it was he said.
Well the Church already gave Jesus blue eyes and light hair several hundred years ago, even though he probably looked a lot like a Palestinian, so why not a few more upgrades.
ReplyDeleteConservapedia appears to be at least temporarily, blessedly dead:
ReplyDeleteServer not found
Firefox can't find the server at www.conservapedia.com.
Hooray!