Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, November 23, 2009

You Can Go with This, or You Can Go with That...

by Eric Martin


Steve Clemons tries to suss out the price tag associated with escalation/continuation in the rudderless conflict in Afghanistan:



The White House is suggesting the price tag will be...$1 million per new soldier per year.


And can I add that these figures do not seem to include the long term health costs that the US commits to with our soldiers -- nor other ongoing benefits.


That means that a surge of 40,000 troops will cost approximately $40 Billion on top of the $65 billion/year the US is currently spending on its military deployments.


$105 billion. [...]


The health care bill that is being considered by the Congress now costs approximately $85 billion/year -- just to set some context.


For more context, Afghanistan's nominal GDP was $11.7 billion last year.


That's right. . .$11.7 billion -- and we are considering spending ten times that on this military engagement.


But think of how many American lives we'll save/make qualitatively better with access to health care...an open-ended multi-decade occupation of Afghanistan.  It's all about priorities.  We can either have a far-flung, interventionist, heavily military-reliant foreign policy, or we can provide the same level of social services as other industrialized nations that have no interest in the former.  I'm not even talking about cutting the military budget in half or anything so drastic.  Just keeping the foreign adventurism in check, and otherwise looking for common sense reductions where we can find them (and if anyone thinks there is no waste in a Pentagon budget, I've got a new line of bridges to sell you).


As a society, these are the decisions we will have to make.  In a sense, America is nearing a crossroads.  We can either have a massive presence in Iraq and Afghanistan for the next quarter century and beyond - and perhaps open up some new fronts - or we can cut back on those enormous expenditures and realign our spending priorities to deliver vital services like infrastructure investment and a true medical social safety net.



1 comment:

  1. and perhaps open up some new fronts
    wherever there be OIL there be the usa
    wherever there be NATURAL RESOURCES needed by Corporate Amerika, there be the usa
    it is as simple as that. there really is not some grand scheme behind whom the usa attacks or occupies ( though why the usa still has post WWII occupation troops in Germany is a puzzle ).
    boil it down ( like dick cheney and ken 'enron' lay did ) - roll out the maps - look to see where the OIL is, where the rare Earth Elements are located and you will see the usa there or circling like the vultures they are.
    how soon before the usa ( with the assistance of Colombia ) cooks up some bullshit in order to attack Venezuela and steal its OIL ??? note i did not type " if " in the preceding sentence.

    ReplyDelete