Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Angry Old White Republicans

Commentary By Ron Beasley



So who are the teabaggers?  Many of the interviews we have seen make them look like undereducated half wits but are they?  Maybe not!



Poll Finds Tea Party Backers Wealthier and More Educated

Tea party supporters are wealthier and more well-educated than the
general public, tend to be Republican, white, male, and married, and
their strong opposition to the Obama administration is more rooted in
political ideology than anxiety about their personal economic
situation, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.



The 18 percent of Americans who identify themselves as Tea Party supporters look like Republicans in many ways, but they hold more conservative views on a range of issues and tend to be older than Republicans generally. They are also more likely than Republicans as a whole to describe themselves as �very conservative� and President Obama as �very liberal.�



And while most Republicans say they are �dissatisfied� with Washington, Tea Party supporters are more likely to classify themselves as �angry.�





As I reported a few weeks ago while the teabaggers are in favor of smaller government and lower taxes they don;'t want to cut any programs.



In some ways, Tea Party supporters look like the general public. For instance, despite their allusions to Revolutionary War-era tax protesters, most describe the amount they paid in taxes this year as �fair.� Most send their children to public schools, do not think Sarah Palin is qualified to be president, and, despite their push for smaller government, think that Social Security and Medicare are worth the cost. They are actually more likely than the general public to have returned their census forms, despite some conservative leaders urging a boycott.

So just like the rest of the country what the really want is a free lunch.  But they are far more pessimistic about the future.

They are far more pessimistic than Americans in general about the
economy improving. More than 90 percent of Tea Party supporters think
the country is headed in the wrong direction, compared with about 60
percent of the general public. About 6 in 10 say America�s best days are
behind us when it comes to the availability of good jobs for American
workers.

These people have every right to be angry but their anger is misdirected.  The destruction of the American Dream began the day St. Ronnie of Reagan took office and the coporatocracy began.  They don't realize those dreaded liberals are on their side as opposed to the corporate interests of the Republicans and the DLC Democrats.  They don't realize that 53% of the taxes they pay goes to the pork laden defense industy - that what is referred to as national defense is more about the defense of the bottom line of defense contractors than keeping them safe.

And they believe the modern snake oil salesman who are really good at making money for themselves by selling lies.



2 comments:

  1. It is an interesting conundrum that so many anti big government teabaggers don't mind big government programs that benefit themselves. And seeing that the vast majority of them are also "greatest generation" white people, who have witnessed in their lifetime a long slow demographic de-evolution of their lot being overcome by "others" -- it seems that the only conclusion left to be drawn is that their primary motivation is race based. Not necessarily out and out racism but a sort of benign racism that is both aware of, and the long term (post civil war) beneficiary of, government legislation that acknowledged their supremacy through segregation, jim crow, and a host of other laws that gave the white population a leg up in opportunity at the expense of the black population's leg down (to put it politely). The election of Barack Obama is thus seen as the final nail in the coffin, and the realization, or imaginary belief that his "socialist" policies are all about a final leveling of the playing field, and that white people will no longer be the preferred people. This would also account for the world going to hell and a hand basket attitude, and why they call him the "anointed one", as opposed to "the elected one".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well said Anna - I didn't want to go there but you're right.

    ReplyDelete