Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thursday, April 8, 2010

C Street Questions, reprised

By Dave Anderson:



Last summer, I asked a very simple question concerning C-Street rents and the possibility that several Congress-critters (including my own, Mike Doyle (D-PA-14)) were receiving tangible benefits that were not be declared on their disclosure forms via discounted rents:

the rent payments seem ridiculously low. The cost of the house was reported to be $1.1 million dollars in 2003. The six occupants are reported to pay $600 per month in rent... that works out to be about $43,000 per year in total rent payments for the house. In an arms length transaction rent payments are expected to cover the capital cost (the mortgage) as well as the operating costs (utilities, maitenance, taxes etc). That is not always the case, but it is a rough guesstimate of what the rent should be. 

...divide the cost of the house by annual revenue streams which produces a current back of the envelope cap rate of more than 25 years. 25 years would be how long the current revenue stream for the house would pay off the capital of the mortgage if there was absolutely no interest AND no operating costs for the house. A typical commercial property cap rate is between 8 to 12 years as the owners need to pay interest on the mortgage and cover operating costs as well. 



Several other people are asking the same question.  CREW and a group of Ohio pastors are raising the below market rate rent as unreported gifts/income to the IRS.  CREW is arguing that the appropriate comparison is hotel rates, which I think is wrong as the appropriate comparison is other non-Congress-critter rentals in nearby buildings in similar shape.  

With that quibble, their complaints are getting an interesting reaction from one of the C-Streeters; asking about finances is religious intolerance and persecution evidently.  TPM Muckraker has the whine of Rep. Jerry Moran (R-KS):

Moran said he continues to live at the house and alleged that complaints about the accommodations were rooted in an "a national effort to exclude matters of faith by public servants."

"I don't think that my interest in studying the Bible with other colleagues of mine in Congress ought to be seen as anything but good or at least personal � whether you think it's good or bad it ought to be a decision I make as a member of Congress, as a human being," he said.



Interesting, very interesting in that a legitimate question about finances is deflected by an appeal to the majority identity aspect of our culture being persecuted.



1 comment:

  1. Interesting, very interesting in that a legitimate question about finances is deflected by an appeal to the majority identity aspect of our culture being persecuted.
    So no reply on the substance of the question was possible. Isn't that all a properly bred press hound would need to catch the scent and follow the trail?

    ReplyDelete