Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

How Much Is Too Much?

Commentary By Ron Beasley



Airline passengers are inconvenienced, airlines are losing money, the Europeans don't have fresh produce and everyone is unhappy. 



To fly through ash or not? That's no easy question 

Six days after volcanic ash shut down the skies over much of Europe, planes are back in the air, but science still can't answer the question:



Is it safe to fly again?



Mother Nature has given Europe a lesson in risk, aviation technology, scientific uncertainty and economics. And how these fields intersect is messy.



Watching the same people who earlier said it was too dangerous to fly now say it's safe "is just more proof that risk is a subjective idea," said David Ropeik, a risk perception expert at Harvard University.



When people turn to science for answers, they get a lot equivocation.



"We really don't have as good a handle as we should on the ash particle size, the ash concentration and most important, just exactly how high the ash got up into the atmosphere," said Gary Hufford, a U.S. government volcano expert based in Anchorage, Alaska.





So how much ash is too much?  Nobody knows:



Ever since a Boeing 747 temporarily lost all four engines in an ash cloud in 1982, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has stipulated that skies must be closed as soon as ash concentration rises above zero. The ICAO's International Airways Volcano Watch uses weather forecasting to predict ash cloud movements, and if any projections intersect a flight path, the route is closed.

But although it is certain that volcanic ash like that hanging over northern Europe can melt inside a jet engine and block airflow, nobody has the least idea about just how much is too much. After a week of losing millions every day, airlines are starting to ask why we can't do better.

It need not be this way, concedes Jonathan Nicholson at the UK's aviation regulator, the Civil Aviation Authority. "There may be a non-zero safe ash level for commercial jets, of so many particles of a certain size per minute," he told New Scientist, "but we just don't know."

How much is too much?  The only people who can make that call are the aircraft engine manufacturers and they haven't.  And perhaps they won't.  It could be they don't want to do the necessary testing or it may be their legal departments won't let them.  What would happen if they said a concentration of X was safe and a plane went down when flying through such an ash cloud - they would have a lawsuit to deal with.  But even if parameters were established we lack a method to measure ash concentration and particle size.  So for the foreseeable the tolerance is likely to remain zero.



















1 comment:

  1. Interesting problem according to BBC last night very difficult to see the damn stuff with radar etc.. Chit-chatting with my son in Brighton - doesn't need to travel for awhile - I'd not want him to fly just now but I'm conscious this fear is based on the fact that I have no real information. Anyway must admit I've been worried about this mess having watched the Mayday episode "All Engines Failed" (only copy I know of is here at this Japanese site but in video is in English http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XMjkyNzUyMDA=.html )
    There is also this Spiked essay questioning how we now deal with risk:
    http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/8607/

    ReplyDelete