By John Ballard
File this under "empty footnotes."
Commenter T. Greer linked an exceptionally good piece by Rand Simberg in New Atlantis which I plan to read more carefully after having scanned it first. Drilling further I came across Simberg's blog which happened to mention Bill Whittle, a name I haven't thought about for some time. Whittle has groomed his considerable writing gifts into part of the foundational underpinnings of Pajamas Media. (Although co-founder Charles Johnson has defected to the Dark Side they still link LGF.)
Once and enthusiastic Whittle fan, I linked several of his essays early in my blog life. But following Katrina he put up a piece entitled "Tribes" which left a bad taste in my mouth. I made note of it at the time but I linked it so my readers could see for themselves what I was talking about. But when I tried to find a link this morning to that essay, all traces have vanished from the cloud. Even cached copies all now seem to be linking his most recent essay at Pajamas which is a litany of excerpts and oil portraits of and by the Founding Fathers, led by a hat tip to the Tea Party patriots delivered with an unsubtle swipe at "big-state socialists."
There is a concerted effort afoot on the part of big-state socialists to paint the Tea Party as a bunch of dangerous, hate-filled radicals with a bunch of crazy new ideas that go far beyond the pale of the traditional American political mainstream.
Let�s ask some reasonable men � because the Founding Fathers were surely the largest collection of reasonable men ever gathered in one place at one time in history � what they thought about the issues raised by the Tea Party movement.
When I occasionally steal entire posts or extended portions which I especially like, part of the reason is that I don't trust that they will always be available at a hot link. I have seen too many links die over time.
But that is not what this post is about. The only reason for this post is to copy here for the record a little note from my old blog (the main links of which no longer work, btw) to help me recall why I stopped being a Bill Whittle fan.This is from September, 2005.
Bill Whittle: Tribes
Okay, okay.
Go read it. Everyone else is, so if you don't you won't be able to call yourself fully in the know. I have been keeping up for about three years. Three or four times a year he puts out another chapter and all the right people ooh and aah and link to it.
It's called Tribes. He contorts himself into knots driving home the point that the essay is not about race or class. He has to be one of the most persuasive writers working today, except maybe Hitchens or Billmon, so he leaves no cracks for easy criticism. But this piece hammers away too much on the already bruised "left", whoever that may be. Since I find myself drawn more in that direction, I suppose the spleen was too bitter for my liking. Strikes me as chauvinistic, in the academic sense of that word. Not enough attention to the virtues of mobility (from one tribe to another, for example). And absolutely nothing about reconciliation. But what might one expect from an atheist. Too much TV. Survivor and all that.
I very much liked some of his earlier stuff...essays called FREEDOM , COURAGE and CONFIDENCE. I posted good comments about Whittle's essays last October. I like reading them in the same way that I like watching a Bruce Willis or Clint Eastwood film. But this time I didn't get the tingle. Oh, well. Maybe I'm getting jaded from too much finger-pointing. I've about had it.
I like to think that in retrospect Mr. Whittle may have had second thoughts about what he had said at the time. Protesting too much, perhaps, about not talking about race or class? I dunno. Never will.
But he and the rest of Pajamas missed a good chance to follow Charles Johnson as he left that side of the political divide.
No comments:
Post a Comment