Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Proto-state formation in Somalia

By Dave Anderson:



Successful states under the Westphalian model have a monopoly on the use of legitimate force within their boundaries.  Hopefully those boundaries coincide with the areas that they control; otherwise there are either temporary autonomous zones of non-state actors, anarchy or client non-state actors controlled by foreign state powers.  State to state interactions are easier for the United States to manage because states have fixed assets and more readily identifiable pressure points, incentives and interests than non-state groups.



Somalia is not a successful, unitary nation-state under the Westphalian model.  Instead it is a fragmented mess whose notional national government is highly dependent on foreign soldiers to control a portion of the capital and several tenuous connections to the outside world.  The TFG does not control the coast, or significant portions of the central and norther portions of the country's internationally recognized borders.  Instead there are de-facto governments in quasi-independent Somaliland and Puntland in the north, and clan-based control of the northeastern ports that supply the Somali pirates. 



This is okay, it is an opportunity to practice foreign policy minimalism to advance American interests:



The US's best interests are served by seeing pockets of stability form
and sustain themselves so that global interconnections can be made, and
multi-issue linkages are possible. These pockets of stability may or may
not be in the form of traditional states of the Westphalian model, but
they are valuable none the less. These pockets are often a recognition
of reality on the ground; local elites, networks and tribal connections
as well as sometimes being the strongest group of thugs around who have
fairly limited objectives can be sources of needed stability from which
proto-states can emerge to better reflect ongoing realities....



- working with the reality that there really is no such thing as a
unified Somali state with an effective central government but there are
regional pockets of stability that are effectively serving as limited
proto-states will be far more successful in accomplishing the limited
political/economic goals of the United States (smooth flow of global
trade, sidelining of radical Islamists who have the capacity and intent
for global strikes) then attempting to re-create a unified Somali state.

Benjamin Powell at Suffolk University (h/t LGM) argues that the non-state governance structures are capable of controlling violence and promote the production of the public good of stability and security in the areas that they control as well or better than the TFG in Mogadishu:

The Somali customary law, Xeer, has existed since pre-colonial times
and continued to operate under colonial rule. The Somali nation-state
tried to replace the Xeer with government legislation and enforcement.
However, in rural areas and border regions where the Somali government
lacked firm control, people continued to apply the common law. When the
Somali state collapsed, much of the population returned to their
traditional legal system.

The Xeer outlaws homicide, assault, torture, battery, rape,
accidental wounding, kidnapping, abduction, robbery, burglary, theft,
arson, extortion, fraud, and property damage. The legal system focuses
on the restitution of victims not the punishment of criminals....

There is no doubt that Somalia remains extremely poor today. However, as
far as living standards can be assessed, they appear to be improving
since the collapse of Somalia�s national government. In fact, standards
are improving faster in Somalia than in most of sub-Saharan Africa.

He notes that there is minimal pirate on Somali violence on land or at sea which implies there is an effective rule of law that can exert significant influence on pirate behavior within the Somali littoral.  It is this limited but real rule of law that is the hope of creating effective proto-states within the colonial era drawn boundaries of Somalia that can favorably interact with the wider world.  Recreating a western-style unitary nation state in Somalia is an expensive and futile pipe-dream.  Supporting proto-states with aid, recognition, money and trade in exchange for a crack down on piracy from the landside is a far more plausible policy course that would actually work. 



2 comments:

  1. I noticed this in the last decade or so. The Islamic courts union seemed to be working for the Somali's, just not for the U.S.
    Hence the wars.

    ReplyDelete
  2. somalia will never be stable unless be left with its own affairs, somali people have had long traditional system for solving any kind of conflictions such as war in between tribes,

    ReplyDelete