By Dave Anderson:
Successful states under the Westphalian model have a monopoly on the use of legitimate force within their boundaries. Hopefully those boundaries coincide with the areas that they control; otherwise there are either temporary autonomous zones of non-state actors, anarchy or client non-state actors controlled by foreign state powers. State to state interactions are easier for the United States to manage because states have fixed assets and more readily identifiable pressure points, incentives and interests than non-state groups.
Somalia is not a successful, unitary nation-state under the Westphalian model. Instead it is a fragmented mess whose notional national government is highly dependent on foreign soldiers to control a portion of the capital and several tenuous connections to the outside world. The TFG does not control the coast, or significant portions of the central and norther portions of the country's internationally recognized borders. Instead there are de-facto governments in quasi-independent Somaliland and Puntland in the north, and clan-based control of the northeastern ports that supply the Somali pirates.
This is okay, it is an opportunity to practice foreign policy minimalism to advance American interests:
The US's best interests are served by seeing pockets of stability form
and sustain themselves so that global interconnections can be made, and
multi-issue linkages are possible. These pockets of stability may or may
not be in the form of traditional states of the Westphalian model, but
they are valuable none the less. These pockets are often a recognition
of reality on the ground; local elites, networks and tribal connections
as well as sometimes being the strongest group of thugs around who have
fairly limited objectives can be sources of needed stability from which
proto-states can emerge to better reflect ongoing realities....- working with the reality that there really is no such thing as a
unified Somali state with an effective central government but there are
regional pockets of stability that are effectively serving as limited
proto-states will be far more successful in accomplishing the limited
political/economic goals of the United States (smooth flow of global
trade, sidelining of radical Islamists who have the capacity and intent
for global strikes) then attempting to re-create a unified Somali state.
Benjamin Powell at Suffolk University (h/t LGM) argues that the non-state governance structures are capable of controlling violence and promote the production of the public good of stability and security in the areas that they control as well or better than the TFG in Mogadishu:
The Somali customary law, Xeer, has existed since pre-colonial times
and continued to operate under colonial rule. The Somali nation-state
tried to replace the Xeer with government legislation and enforcement.
However, in rural areas and border regions where the Somali government
lacked firm control, people continued to apply the common law. When the
Somali state collapsed, much of the population returned to their
traditional legal system.The Xeer outlaws homicide, assault, torture, battery, rape,
accidental wounding, kidnapping, abduction, robbery, burglary, theft,
arson, extortion, fraud, and property damage. The legal system focuses
on the restitution of victims not the punishment of criminals....There is no doubt that Somalia remains extremely poor today. However, as
far as living standards can be assessed, they appear to be improving
since the collapse of Somalia�s national government. In fact, standards
are improving faster in Somalia than in most of sub-Saharan Africa.
He notes that there is minimal pirate on Somali violence on land or at sea which implies there is an effective rule of law that can exert significant influence on pirate behavior within the Somali littoral. It is this limited but real rule of law that is the hope of creating effective proto-states within the colonial era drawn boundaries of Somalia that can favorably interact with the wider world. Recreating a western-style unitary nation state in Somalia is an expensive and futile pipe-dream. Supporting proto-states with aid, recognition, money and trade in exchange for a crack down on piracy from the landside is a far more plausible policy course that would actually work.
I noticed this in the last decade or so. The Islamic courts union seemed to be working for the Somali's, just not for the U.S.
ReplyDeleteHence the wars.
somalia will never be stable unless be left with its own affairs, somali people have had long traditional system for solving any kind of conflictions such as war in between tribes,
ReplyDelete