Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, April 19, 2010

Reflections on U.S. vs China Healthcare

By John Ballard



Via Crawford Killian a look at Chinese health care. The writer is a physician who works in and blogs about China. As you read, let the music of free enterprise and the beauties of the marketplace play in the background. 




I�m still recovering from the brutal jetlag of a Boston-Beijing flight, but I�ve spent my foggy-headed days and Ambien-infused nights thinking about my wonderful experience at a Harvard-sponsored medical education conference. While I was listening to lecture after lecture from Harvard�s top docs, surrounded by hundreds of primary care colleagues, I basked in the room�s positive, intellectual energy and rekindled my pride in my profession. I realized that I am extraordinarily lucky to be born in the U.S., and to be an American citizen and doctor � especially when I compare my job to my Chinese colleagues�.


I recently had the unfortunate need to require some specialty medical care of my own, and I�ve been a patient a couple times at Tongren Hospital, one of China�s top eye hospitals. Tongren is exactly as I had envisioned � a madly crowded hospital full of countryside Chinese waiting in the hallways for days to get their 5-minute consult with what they�ve heard are the best eye doctors in China. Lines are long; people smoke in the halls and spit in trashcans. In the midst of all this normality, I had a first-rate eye exam by a cornea specialist, Dr Deng. She was very thorough, spoke good english, and helped me navigate the lines with ease.


It was � and is � impossible for me to encounter her and many of her physician colleagues without feeling acutely aware of how much better off is my life and my lifestyle. We are assuredly equally intelligent and motivated doctors, and yet just because of where we are born, I make magnitudes more than my Chinese colleagues. Not only that, but my daily job is far more rewarding as I see 25-30 patients maximum per day, while they would see 50-150 a day, or more � and there would still be hundreds outside their doors. Doesn�t sound very satisfying, does it? Well, it isn�t, and it�s demonstrated in many surveys here in China. There was a good review from China Daily (Doctors at receiving end in medical reform) discussing the high levels of stress and depression among Chinese doctors. And the Lancet recently had a great article also detailing the underlying perverse incentives in Chinese healthcare that have created frustrations for both doctors and their patients. Here are some highlights from the China Daily article:


Chinese physicians � referred to as �white wolves� by some due to their trademark white coats and reputation for profiting from prescriptions � are not a happy bunch. One in four suffers moderate to severe depression due to the stress of the job, according to a nationwide study by Peking University commissioned by the Ministry of Health�


So what is wrong with the medical profession?


According to health professionals, lawyers and academics, the key problems are an evaluation system that is based on a doctor�s ability to generate revenue for a hospital, a certification requirement that effectively prevents doctors from changing jobs and conflicting procedures for medical disputes that �encourage cover-ups�.

Of the more than 8,000 Chinese physicians polled � about 3,000 in cities and 5,000 in the countryside � as part of the Peking University study, most were 44 or younger, married and well educated.


�However, our research showed that the majority of doctors have a much higher degree of anxiety and depression than most citizens,� said Qiu Zeqi, a sociology professor who led the research published in October 2009. �They also have a very poor work attitude.�


The pressure on doctors comes partly from the way their performance is evaluated, said Zheng Shanhai, a doctor at China Meitan General Hospital in Beijing. �Money has become the major measurement,� he said. �Each section of a hospital has a different revenue target, and a doctor�s performance is evaluated monthly according to how much he helps to meet that target.�


Medics generate revenue through checkups and prescriptions they make out, which patients use to purchase drugs at the hospital�s pharmacy.


Doctors also charge a minimal service fee. In Beijing, patients pay about 5 yuan ($0.70) for an appointment � 4 yuan goes to the local government, 0.5 yuan to the hospital and 0.5 yuan to the doctor, said Chen Yan, a doctor specializing in respiratory medicine with Beijing�s China-Japan Friendship Hospital.


So, I am glad that healthcare reforms are taking place � in both my home country and here in China. I am very proud that Obama and his team have finally enacted into law the idea that universal healthcare is a right and not a privilege. And I�m very pleased that the bill strongly pushes for more preventive care as well as more primary care doctors. On this side of the ocean, I am very impressed by China�s recognition of their own challenges and their new laws to fix things. But it clearly will take decades before a Chinese doctor gets the same salary, lifestyle and respect that their foreign colleagues already earn. In this context, I feel a deep compassion and respect for my Chinese colleagues, as well as a heartfelt thanks for the enormous head start I was given just from my birthplace.

Dr. Richard Saint Cyr has no axe to grind in the US.
Funny, isn't it, how different a new American approach to medical care looks from outside?

2 comments:

  1. Sure does. It looks like crap from someone from the outside in a country with good health care. Try not to break an arm patting yourself on the back, because you don't have universal healthcare yet, not even close.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Believe me, I know.
    Evert Cilliers has this description:
    Now Obama's got his healthcare victory, but how progressive is it? It's basically what the Republicans wanted in 1994, and what Massachusetts already has, signed into existence by Republican Governor Mitt Romney. It's socialism all right, but not for us, only for the healthcare industry, who've now got 30 million extra premium payers, many of them subsidized with our tax dollars. For this bonanza they're paying the small price of not keeping folks off their rolls because of a "pre-existing condition," and not knocking them off their rolls for getting sick (the reason why people buy insurance in the first place), and not capping what they pay out for people's medical expenses. In other words, for promising not to openly cheat their customers anymore, the insurance industry gets to continue running their 20% to 30% overheads scam when Medicare can deliver healthcare at 4% overhead (proving once again that government is more efficient at helping folks out than our magnificently efficient private enterprise plutocrats).
    Some reform. But it's a start. When the insurance companies begin to jack up their premiums again, or pull some other scam, there may still be enough residual public anger simmering around to put a robust public option on the table at last, and soon we'll be on our way to Medicare for all. Be still, my progressive heart. Who knows, this delicious scenario may even be a second-term adventure in the back of Obama's Machiavellian mind at this very moment. Or not. Dream on.
    All we have is a creeping step forward.
    A decent system is still waaaay off.

    ReplyDelete