Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Still Clueless After All These Years

Commentary By Ron Beasley



Just when I thought the overinflated and clueless ego of Thomas Friedman couldn't become even more clueless and inflated he pens a gem.  The "Green Tea Party?"

I�ve been trying to understand the Tea Party Movement. Sounds like a lot
of angry people who want to get the government out of their lives and
cut both taxes and the deficit. Nothing wrong with that � although one
does wonder where they were in the Bush years. Never mind. I�m sure
like all such protest movements the Tea Partiers will get their 10 to 20
percent of the vote. But should the Tea Partiers actually aspire to
break out of that range, attract lots of young people and become
something more than just entertainment for Fox News, I have a
suggestion:



Become the Green Tea Party.



I�d be happy to design the T-shirt
logo and write the manifesto. The logo is easy. It would show young
Americans throwing barrels of oil imported from Venezuela and Saudi
Arabia into Boston Harbor.



The manifesto is easy, too: �We, the
Green Tea Party, believe that the most effective way to advance
America�s national security and economic vitality would be to impose a
$10 �Patriot Fee� on every barrel of imported oil, with all proceeds
going to pay down our national debt.�





Poor Tom has once again not been paying attention.  The Tea Party movement is made up of old white Republicans who are still fighting the civil war.  Anything that is even a shade of green will be seen as a socialist/fascist plot to take away their pickup trucks and SUV's.  What they are really upset about is a black Democrat in the White House and they are being played like a fiddle by the rich oligarchs who have everything to lose if environmentalism takes hold.




Toms House So why don't you just go back to your modest little home Tom and spare the rest of us your idiotic ramblings.  



More Reactions:



Steve Benen;

One of the reasons I'm inclined to write about the Tea Partiers is that
there are still many in the political establishment who believe the
political mainstream should do more to take the Tea Party crowd and its
hysterical cries seriously. This strikes me as silly -- most of the
activists seem to have no idea what they're talking about. Why explore
substantive challenges with angry mobs who reject reason and evidence?





John Cole;

They weren�t around protesting during the Bush years BECAUSE THE TEA PARTY IS REPUBLICANS. They don�t care about the deficit. They care that a Democrat (and a black �Muslim,� to boot), is in the White House. They don�t care about fiscal restraint, they care that a Democrat is in the White House. They don�t, as some foolishly pretend, care about the Wall Street excesses. Certainly Cenk Uyger is not the only one who has noticed that the tea party bubbas could all be shipped to protest HCR, but the big money boys aren�t running the buses to protest Wall Street. They care that there is a Democrat in the White House.



And those crowds of angry white old people screaming �keep government out of my medicare� and waving signs of �Drill, baby, drill?� They sure as hell don�t care about the environment and are not going to become some sort of �Green Tea Party.�



All they care about is that there is a Democrat in the White House.











4 comments:

  1. Wow, I love this article, it is so insightful! I can't believe the world isn't blessed more with this genius.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lets hear it for two bands of idiots belittling the other and isolating themselves from the middle.
    The majority of non-tea partiers understand that Tea Partiers tend to be just recycled republicans via Glenn Beck and Fox News.
    However, the majority of non-tea partiers actually agree with the economic opinions of the tea party movement, and only shift away when the typical republican xenophobia and social conservatism rears its head in the movement.
    Meanwhile, this typical US liberal reaction of elistism and belittling not only is horribly weak on promoting the real arguments of progressivism, but is also likely to isolate progressives away from the more tolerant and independent individuals who do still have misgivings about the current size and scope of government.
    That particular group is huge, likely much larger than the Tea Party movement, and they are going to swing hard against democrats.
    I guarantee that I will despise every single republican these tea partiers and conservative independents will send into power, but is growing to be an inevitable event.
    I will blame people like you for it, Ron.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Um, interesting comment thread ya got going here... "The majority of non-tea partiers actually agree with the economic opinions of the tea party movement"...?
    I had seen the Cole piece already, but this is a valuable roundup. I know Friedman needs to fill copy, but it's pretty sad that the bleeding obvious escapes him and so many highly-paid columnists.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maybe it's just me, but the image of people dumping barrels of oil into Boston Harbor doesn't really seem all that green to me.

    ReplyDelete