By Dave Anderson:
The Progressive Realist's, Judah Grunstein, notes that European countries are treating their expeditionary militaries and the capabilities to deploy forces 7,500 kilometers from home soil as a useful but discretionary capability that has real costs as well as real benefits. Those costs and benefits are different in flush times than in times of austerity.
Western Europe is more than capable of defending itself against any probable threat. Defense spending above that limit is for expeditionary capacity to influence global events and situations. As I have argued elsewhere, the politics of excluding defense spending, specifically defense spending on an expeditionary war of relatively minor importance, from cuts is untenable for most nations.Defense News has the grim rundown: ten percent cuts in Italy on top of already planned reductions, $1.2 billion slashed annually in Germany, and reports (undenied by the Defense Ministry) of up to $6 billion over the next three years in France. According to the German defense minister, the cuts there will not be cosmetic, but will result in real reductions in capabilities and operation
in the minds of most voting publics, Afghanistan as it is currently funded is a luxury expenditure. Great Britain is not the first country to think about leaving Afghanistan (or Iraq) due to budget constraints, nor will it be the last.
No comments:
Post a Comment