Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, August 30, 2010

Mile-Wide Asteroid Might Hit Earth In 2019

By Steve Hynd


Worried about American imperialist adventures abroad, or the rising deficit, or erosion of American democracy? None might matter much longer.



An asteroid more than a mile wide is heading for earth, posing the greatest threat yet by an object approaching the planet, scientists have warned.


The asteroid � called 2002 NT7 � was spotted only three weeks ago, but could strike on 1 February 2019, the US space agency Nasa said. Itis the first asteroid to rank positive on Nasa's Palermo scale, which combines the urgency of the object's threat with its potential effect. All other known objects have had negative values.


Bennt Peiser of John Moores University in Liverpool said the 1.2 mile-wide object had become "the most threatening object" in the short history of asteroid detection.


Gerrit Verschuur, an astrophysicist and radio astronomer at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee, said the impact would create a fireball so intense it would kill anyone who could see it, after which material thrown into the air would shower half the world with flaming debris. "It would be as if the sky itself had caught fire," he said.


The heat would set fire to forests and cities, after which dust would fill the atmosphere, obscuring the sun for a month. That in turn would kill plants and animals, so that only creatures that lived underground would have a strong chance of survival.


But there are still large uncertainties about the asteroid's orbit. Dr Andrew Coates of the Mullard Space Science Laboratory in London said: "Most likely it will not hit us, but it's the highest-risk of any object that we know of at the moment." But Donald Yeomans of Nasa told the BBC that the margin of error in the predicted orbit might be "several tens of millions of kilometres".


So, no need to panic and start digging just yet...


...but then again, 2019 is about as far in the future as the invasion of Afghanistan is in the past. We haven't been able to solve the Afghan problem since 2002, and an endevour like working out how to deflect or stop a huge hunk of rock, millions of miles into space, then implementing that solution has got to be somewhere up there on a scale of difficulty.


So sure, keep worrying about those overseas occupations (however rebranded) and keep worrying about all the other terrestial things we have to worry about. But we really do need to find some resources and some time to worry about future bolts from the blue too - to say nothing of other major challenges like global climate change.


Trouble is, those resources are tied up in deficit spending and runaway military budgets, while the time will be carved up into the usual short-termist chunks between elections. And if by some cosmic chance that big hunk of rock heads our way...


Here we are, with the "serious people" worrying about the cost of weapons that suck hundreds of billions of budget dollars and the entire budget for finding and dealing with such asteroids is a measly$4 million a year.



1 comment:

  1. Hi Mark,
    I got it from @mparent777 Twitter feed today and didn't even think to look for the date. Thanks!
    Still, that this one missed doesn't invalidate the general argument, that budget priorities are seriously imbalanced in favor of the Pentagon. I keep being amazed that someone at State, for example, isn't making more noise about their loss of bureaucratic prestige and budget dollars to Defense as the military co-opts even the bits of nation-building that should rightly be USAID's job.
    Regards, Steve

    ReplyDelete