Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Saturday, August 21, 2010

The Pain Caucus rides again

By Dave Anderson:

The Pain Caucus is a perpetual thorn in the side of progressives as a prerequisite to be serious is to be innumerate to the degree that solving any problem by government action even if it results in lower spending profiles must be opposed if somewhere, some poor person (poor defined as someone earning under median income) is made better off.  This is the source of elite support for wrecking Social Security --- we must cut benefits now to forestall the possibility of small future cuts (forget the fact that we are playing fiscal three card monte where the savings that extend the trust fund don't count as that would require higher income taxes in the near future.) 

Paul Krugman is fighting the good fight against the invisible inferi and bond vigilantes who are forcing long term interest rates to record lows because they are so concerned about future inflation!

And some of the scenarios being proposed were just plain bizarre: the
bond bubble will burst, and this will plunge us into recession, and the
Fed will have to buy up government debt, and this will mean inflation
too. Really.

And then the whole story shifted: suddenly it wasn�t the carry trade,
it was sovereign debt risks, we�re all Greece.

And now there�s a new one: you see, low interest rates will cause
deflation. Really
(near the end).

And though the story shifts, the moral is always the same: the little
people have to suffer. [emphasis mine]




The underlying concept of supply side economics as it has been implemented is that the little people (97% of the US population) have it too easy, and can buy up too many scarce resources thus increasing prices. Anything that makes it harder for the little people through price signals or cutting back the safety net is a good thing; fuck the costs, as the elite can externalize or make it back with another capital gains tax cut. 



2 comments:

  1. The Pain Caucus is a perpetual thorn in the side of progressives as a prerequisite to be serious is to be innumerate to the degree that solving any problem by government action even if it results in lower spending profiles must be opposed if somewhere, some poor person (poor defined as someone earning under median income) is made better off.
    Dave, after years of torture at your hands, I've finally figured out your problem: English just can't be your first language - or your second - or your third.
    Your native language has to be something like Mandarin Chinese -- or Klingon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Like, maybe, Howlin` Worf?

    ReplyDelete