Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thursday, September 30, 2010

So What?

Commentary By Ron Beasley




The Wall Street Journal headline reads: McDonald's May Drop Health Plan. Of course it turns out not to be true but even if it was - so what?  Let's look at what the McDonald's employees might lose.




MACBEN
This is not health insurance it's a scam.  The Basic and Medium plans are no better than no insurance at all.  As you may recall my short ride in an ambulance and 13 hours in the hospital cost over $5,000. 



Jonathan Cohn:



As the Journal story makes clear, the policies in question are so-called mini-med plans with very limited benefits. In the case of McDonald's, according to the Journal, there are two options: Employees who go with the minimum plan pay $14 a week for a policy that won't cover more than $2,000 in medical bills a year. Employees who opt for the "generous" option pay about $32 a week for a policy that maxes out at $10,000.



To call that "insurance" is to distort the definition, since these policies would do very little to help people with even moderately serious medical conditions. (You can blow through $10,000 in medical care with one emergency room visit.) And those are the people whom insurance is supposed to help, since they are the ones who face serious financial hardship or have serious trouble getting access to care. As Aaron Caroll, who now blogs at the Incidental Economist, wrote several months ago when the issue first came up, "There are a host of health insurance plans out there that are cheap. It�s just that the majority of those also are crappy. Sure, they�re great if you�re healthy. They only stink when you get sick; but that�s when you need them."





Update

James Joyner gets it right.

At the end of the day, our business financed system just doesn�t make
sense, for a whole variety of reasons. We�d be better off with some
sort of baseline single payer system with the ability for those who can
afford it to supplement their coverage.





Cross posted at The Moderate Voice



2 comments:

  1. I noticed the WSJ article and Fox blaring this morning just before I went to sleep. My first reaction was to not believe the WSJ and, obviously, Fox.
    My second reaction was to laugh at my own piddly job for not offering insurance when McD's does.
    To wake up and read this made me feel better about the whole dang situation.
    Of course, I'm still laughing...

    ReplyDelete
  2. You are so right. That's not insurance but a shameful scam, a notch above payday loan sharks and pawnbrokers. Anything leading to the end of such schemes is a step in the right direction. PPACA caught these crooks red-handed with the requirement that 85% of premiums be used for health care. Another rip-off bites the dust.
    Uncoupling employment and health insurance is long overdue. I would like to see a wholesale abandonment of group insurance, which is nothing more than a collection of discriminatory risk pools excluding individuals and families without employment, those most in need of a health care safety net. In the event of layoff or disability what is the logic of anyone's losing health insurance along with the main source of income? Health insurance should be portable and affordable. And yes, it should also actually be insurance.

    ReplyDelete