By Dave Anderson:
The official US counter-insurgency doctrine has a significant amount of reliance on confidence building measures. US troops are there to build up the legitimacy of the local governments by increasing the disputed populations' confidence in the governments' abilities to provide public goods (including security).
A frequent part of this mission is building up the capabilities and the numbers of competent local security forces. The best way to do that is by embedding US trainers and mentors with the local security forces. The mentors are supposed to be deeply intermeshed with their mentees (eat, sleep, shit, fight, clean and fart together). That only works when there is mutual trust on the parts of the mentors and the mentees' officers and non-commissioned officers.
So when the New York Times reports the following blurb, that trust (which is hard to establish anyways) becomes a lot more fragile:
Six NATO service members who were training the Afghan border police were killed Monday when a border police officer turned his gun on them, according to a NATO statement and Gen. Aminullah Amarkhail, the Afghan Border Police commander for Nangahar Province....
It was at least the fifth time in 13 months that Afghan soldiers or police have turned their weapons on their NATO partners....
Oh well, the foreign internal defense mission, as part of the softer side of COIN is going away anyways as the US is pivoting to Special Ops raids and large scale sweeps again (hey it did not work for the Russians, but why not try this one more time).
And once again the "Nato" troops turn out to be American. I get so sick of that. It's a ploy to give this 10 year nightmare legitimacy.
ReplyDelete