Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

The 2011 profits of instability

By Dave Anderson:


A "reasonable" amount of localized political instability in major oil-exporting nations is an extremely profitable situation for relatively stable oil exporters.  Saudi Arabia, among other, oil exporting nations is seeing the value of their oil exports increase dramatically as the civil war in Libya has taken a little less than 1% of the global supply of daily crude oil off the market at a time when supplies are tight. 


Stuart Saniford at the Oil Drum has taken a look at whether or not the Saudis are releasing excess capcity to make up for the short-fall.  They are not, and he speculates on a very plausible reason:



Saudi production has increased to around 9mbd, but the timing makes it clear this has nothing to do with Libya....


The Saudis were slowly increasing their production from last fall through February, presumably in response to growing global demand and rising prices.  But then, in March, when Libyan production went into freefall, they put on the brakes and did almost nothing to make up for the shortage....


my take is that the failure to increase production to compensate for Libya is deliberate.  We can only speculate, but my guess is that, having watched how the west has helped to ease Mubarak and Ben-Ali out of power and is intervening in Libya to the same end, the Saudi regime is in no mood to care about our desire for more oil. Instead, they are very much in the mood to build as large a war chest as possible with which to appease their own population, strengthen their defense measures, etc.



This line of reasoning leads one to an obvious explanation as to why the United States has said nothing of the Saudi intervention in Bahrain to crush Shi'ite protests against the minority Sunni ruling regime.  The Saudis are sitting on excess capacity to generate increased pricing and geo-political power, and they can threaten to have "technical" problems that would take off another half a million or more barrels per day.  The Saudis and any other major oil exporter with significant cheap to produce reserve capacity can and are profiting from instability as those profits allow them to pay off their populations and avoid the bread/staples price inflation that provided Tunisian and Egyptian protest sub-structure.



1 comment:

  1. This line of reasoning leads one to an obvious explanation as to why the United States has said nothing of the Saudi intervention in Bahrain

    ReplyDelete