By BJ Bjornson
Dead at 56 from pancreatic cancer. I can't think of much to say about his passing outside of "Damn!" He was clearly one of the most iconic individuals in business and particulalry technology, and more than a few of the products Apple created under his leadership changed the landscape, or created their own like the iPad. As John Cole says, not a bad legacy. I'm quite certain he'll be missed.
Agree with you BJ all Jobs strangeness aside likely the only American recently to have had a positive effect for us - all human beings - on the world.
ReplyDeleteI'm now such a shit I await the politico's to frame his innovations into some left/right; liberal/conservative etc. framework.
Me. I'm sorry he is dead. I just thought he was a need guy, eh.
I certainly can't deny that his genius changed the world and I am sorry to see him go. But he was a control freak not unlike his nemesis Bill Gates and as such may have hindered progress.
ReplyDeleteHe created the Apple computer and insisted on closed architecture so that he could control it. IBM created the PC and opted for open architecture, knowing that they would lose control of it but that the world would be changed and they would ultimately benefit, as would the rest of the world, from the change.
ReplyDeleteSteve Jobs created some really neat toys. He did not change the world or, ulitimately, leave any legacy of benefit to society, science or mankind.
And so it was that a nameless Arab American baby was adopted by an Armenian American family. Clara Hagopian and her husband Paul Jobs had been married around seven years and had not been able to conceive. The little bundle that would be Steve, was very much wanted in the Jobs household.
ReplyDeletehttp://newamericamedia.org/2011/10/steve-jobs-was-an-arab-american.php
@Bill � I don�t recall IBM creating an open architecture knowing they would lose control of it. Their �opening up� was actually a decision to outsource their operating system to Microsoft and their microprocessors to Intel, who then used that technology to create their own monopolies and destroy IBM�s. Prior to that, IBM was just as vertically-integrated as Apple, with full control over the software and hardware.
ReplyDeleteAnd when it comes to �open�, Microsoft Windows is among the most jealously guarded and closed proprietary systems there is, and that didn�t seem to have hurt it in the slightest, though, unlike Apple, who don�t have anything close to a monopoly, Microsoft certainly has used their dominant market position in the past to scuttle opposition.