By John Ballard
I just came across an item in my morning reading that reminded me of Steve's dystopian vision of what's happening to America.
One elegant explanation of why the Roman Empire collapsed was that the effect of lead poisoning in the water supply caused widespread brain damage in the population which undermined the social fabric. How would that happen? Two ways are mentioned. Someone discovered that when wine went sour it tasted better if stored long enough in a lead vessel. The wine tasted a little sweeter but whoever drank it was ingesting an overdose of lead. Also, aqueducts delivering water to those famous fountains and the Roman water supply were leak-proofed by lead, much the same way that sewer lines are sometimes done even now.There's more but that will set the stage for this---
Is that Flame Retardant in your Soft Drink?
Brominated vegetable oil is patented as a flame retardant and it�s banned in food all over Europe and Japan, but it�s on the ingredient list of about 10 percent of sodas in the U.S. It�s not in Coca-Cola, but is in Mountain Dew, Fanta Orange, and in some flavors of Powerade and Gatorade. What brominated vegetable oil (BVO) does to soda is, Coca-Cola explains, �prevent the citrus flavoring oils from floating to the surface in beverages.� The fruit flavors that are mixed into a drink would otherwise settle out. What BVO does when it�s acting as a flame retardant is not much different: It slows down the chemical reactions that cause a fire�
Safe For Consumption?
The FDA established safety limits for the substance in the 1970s, but Environmental Health News reports about growing concerns that the limit was informed by reports put out by an industry group containing outdated and, as industry-generated information tends to be, less-than-comprehensive data. EHN has the details: After a few extreme soda binges � not too far from what many gamers regularly consume � a few patients have needed medical attention for skin lesions, memory loss and nerve disorders, all symptoms of overexposure to bromine. Other studies suggest that BVO could be building up in human tissues, just like other brominated compounds such as flame retardants. In mouse studies, big doses caused reproductive and behavioral problems.
EHN explains that BVO was pulled from the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) list for flavor additives in 1970, �bounced back after studies from an industry group from 1971 to 1974 demonstrated a level of safety,� at which point the Flavor Extract Manufacturers� Association (which actually exists�not to be confused with the government agency FEMA) �petitioned the FDA to get BVO back in fruit-flavored beverages, this time as a stabilizer, which is its role today.�
Interim Approval � For More Than 30 Years Today, more than 30 years (and much animal testing, including on pigs and beagles) later, the approval status for BVO is still listed as interim. EHN reports that changing that status would be expensive and quotes FDA spokesman Douglas Karas saying it �is not a public health priority for the agency at this time.�
With BVO banned in so many countries, there are feasible alternatives. And that brings us to the unsurprising but disturbing note on which the EHN story ends:
Wim Thielemans, a chemical engineer at the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom, said since the alternatives are already used in Europe �their performance must be acceptable, if not comparable, to the U.S.-used brominated systems.� That means �the main driver for not replacing them may be cost,� he said. �It is a North American problem,� Vetter added. �In the E.U., BVO will never be permitted.�
Europeans are routinely vilified by our political types, particularly those on the Right whose contempt for anything looking like a Nanny or Welfare State is evidence of Big Gubmint Gone Wild. Every time I hear another anti-foreign screed I think about two other differences that gnaw at my craw.
The first is how the Internet worldwide is more often than not available by a satellite system instead of cell towers. As recently as last week I came across a reference to how Syria had attempted to cut off the Internet by turning off the cell system. But people with satellite smart phones were still able to communicate anyway.
The other, less dramatic but probably more costly, is that American credit cards are still the original analogue type with a magnetic strip. But most of the rest of the world uses smart cards with microchips in each card. I'm sure they may be as risky to carry as cash but they are far less subject to theft just from stealing the number. The US banking system's risk-reward calculations conclude it is cheaper in the long run to pay the costs of fraud rather than retrofit the infrastructure to accommodate more secure cards.
(Looking for a link I see a couple of companies are testing the water, but not before even that technology is already becoming obsolete.)
Come on John you're kidding about the US not having smart cards. All my credit cards have them plus all my bank - debt - cards also. Only place I've been recently that didn't have the appropriate card reader for them was a local Bose store which I thought was very strange. To access my HSBC accounts or my domestic banks, to get cash or account infor, in the EU or UK I needed a smart card with lots of ATMs.
ReplyDeleteI had to look it up, but you're right. Smart cards are finally creeping into use in the US. Down here in Cherokee County, Georgia, we are still fairly provincial. Innovations are slowly coming, though. To my surprise the Georgia Legislature recently passed a bill authorizing the use of smart cards for Medicaid beneficiaries."If approved, a pilot program will go out to bid..." the article says. You won't find anybody rushing into anything new around here.
ReplyDeleteOur Luddites are very up to date, in fact. They have blogs and keep up with all the sinister plots the gubmint has to take over our lives. This comment turned up in my search on a blog that appears to be one of Michelle Bachmann's children.
Obviously Republican Sen. John Albers of Roswell, gives little thought to anything except pleasing our left progressive leaders.
Citizens, congratulations on electing a Toady.
You see what I mean...
Under our last, liberal president the US had some of the most stringent environmental laws in the world. These included consumer protections against various, noxious substances found in manufactured goods.
ReplyDeleteNow we have the least restrictive laws on what can be sold in consumer goods. Though probably not enforced, China actually has tougher regulations. I have read (and it was in a book on this subject, the title of which is escaping me right now) that whole container ships get turned away from EU ports because they don't meet consumer environmental laws. Those ships simply turn left and then stock the shelves of American stores.
Will we ever have another liberal giant like Richard Milhouse Nixon?