Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Markets coincide with boogeymen

By Fester:



Poliblogger is looking at FARC, the leftist insurgency/cog of multiple drug cartels, while also looking at a stupid question from someone who is either naive or trying to score some cheap political points.  The good doctor outlines some brief history and explains that markets work --- when groups have money and seek reasonably common and available goods, they tend to get those goods:

Here�s the deal: the FARC became an active guerrilla group in Colombia in the 1960s. Hugo Ch�z became president of Venezuela in 1998. As such, the FARC were able to get guns for over three decades before Tirofijo3 and friends had ever heard of Hugo.



The sad fact of the matter is, the FARC can easily obtain weapons these days via the profits they make over their involvement in the drug trade, as well as via kidnapping. While it would not surprise me to find that they have found aid from Venezuelan quarters in their weapon-gathering activities, it is also the case that Hugo Ch�z could be beamed into space tomorrow and the FARC would still be able to get their weapons.

There is a global arms market and it services consumers who are not always nice or honest or friendly to the United States.  And it is global and pervasive with one significant constraint.  Its customers better have cash.  And given that the international drug trade is predominately a cash and carry business, FARC does not face that constraint. 



And this is common.  I believe that the same type of relationship networks exist between many of the Shi'ite militias and elements of the Iranian government but even if the Iranian government was replaced wholesale with US bureaucrats tomorrow morning, the Shi'ite militias (JAM, Badr et al) would still be heavily armed and have reasonably flexible and resilient arms acquisition networks as there is too much money to be made selling them weapons. 



Markets exist and they flow to where the money is and sometimes that is next to the daily boogeyman. 



1 comment:

  1. Money is fungible. Whatever Chavez gives FARC ( I assume with strings attached) is money and time saved to be spent on somehing else. More than likely, basic arms are less crucial to FARC than if Venezuela provides them with documents, visas, advanced training,intel, communication equipment, computers, connections to third parties etc. Sort of military seed capital to play at a higher qualitative level.

    ReplyDelete