Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, August 3, 2009

Closing the Overton Window on COIN

By Fester


The Overton window is closed in foreign policy. The range of acceptable opinions is from the Kagan clan of neo-cons to somewhat liberalish Center for New American Security on the sort of left. Brookings, CAP, Heritage, AEI all assume American hegemony is supreme and should be maintained in an unchallenged state through spending twice the global average on defense despite the fact that the current opponents that the US is engaged in combat with have budgets that are not even rounding errors in a single service's sub-budget. The major debate is on methods and tactics, not goals and strategies.


Matthew Yglesias has a good illustration of the narrow band of 'elite' discourse on a wide variety of subjects:



Things start out okay on the Middle East where they ask one person from CAP (left) one from AEI (right) and two from the Carnegie Endowment (center). But on energy, they ask one person from CAP (left) one from AEI (right) and one from Cato (also right). Then on economic history they go for Cato (right), Brookings (center), and Americans for Tax Reform (right). On American political history, it�s Cato (right), Brookings (center) and Heritage Foundation (right) and Foreign Policy Initiative (right).




Fabius Maximus looks at the experts who were part of the McChrystal strategy review team that is now proposing an expansive, and expensive counter-insurgency campaign in Afghanistan:



1. Stephen Biddle, Council on Foreign Relations (Author of the classic Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle)


2. Anthony Cordesman, Center for Strategic and International Studies


3. Catherine Dale, Congressional Research Service


4. Etienne de Durand, director of the Center for Strategic Studies at the Institut Francais des Relations Internationales (no bio found)


5. Andrew Exum, a former Army Ranger, counterinsurgency expert, and blogger at the Center for a New American Security


6. Fred Kagan, American Enterprise Institute


7. Kimberly Kagan, Institute for the Study of War


8. Whitney Kassel, Office of the Secretary of Defense (no bio found, possible author of these and these articles)


9. Terry Kelly, senior researcher at the RAND Corporation


10. Luis Peral, European Union�s Institute for Strategic Studies


11. Lt. Col. Aaron Prupas, USAF officer at Centcom (USAF Academy, Class of 1987; no bio found)


12. Jeremy Shapiro, civil-military relations analyst at the Brookings Institution


Again, the Overton window of potentially plausible options under discussion is very narrow. And getting the argument that an open-ended system and society transforming effort that optimistically will take a decade or more and cost several trillion dollars may not be a good idea has been damn difficult because there is no "credentialled" and "legitimate" figure who will make that argument. So the peanut gallery of Cassandras snipe and hope that we are wrong.



Posted by at
Labels:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)