Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, November 9, 2010

The not so flat earth!

Commentary By Ron Beasley


One of my first blog posts was Oil, Half Way To Empty.  When I wrote that post over six years ago there was very little Peak Oil discussion in the media or the blogosphere.  In that post I quoted James Howard Kunstler:



"The whole Archer Daniels Midland model of turning oil into corn into Taco Bell�that whole complex, that system, is really going to be over," says Kuntsler. "We're going to be forced to grow more of our food locally and return to a kind of agriculture that really hasn't been practiced here in a long time. A lot of the land that has only had value as suburban development in the past 30 or 40 years is going to have to be reassigned."


Likewise, Kunstler foresees "the demise of Wal-Mart style, big box, national chains." Companies whose profit margins depend on "merchandise made by factories 12,000 miles away" simply won't function in a world of $100-plus barrels of oil. "We're going to have to seriously reorganize our whole system of retail trade and economy."



Six years later ex banker Jeff Rubin is sounding a lot like Kunstler.  He starts out by explaining that our current recession  was not caused by the mortgage crisis but a spike in oil prices.



Every major recession in the post-war period has oil's fingerprints all over it. The 1973 first oil shock led to what was then the deepest post-war recession, at the time. The second OPEC oil shock led to no less than two recessions: 1979 and 1982. And then when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, and left half of its oil fields on fire, and oil spiked to the then unheard-of price of $40 barrel, lo and behold, the industrialized world again fell into recession.


Gee, I wonder what happened to oil prices before this recession. It seems to me that oil prices went from about $30 barrel, at the beginning of 2004, to almost $150 barrel by 2008. Even in real terms, that is, inflation-adjusted, that price increase was over double the price increase of either the first or the second OPEC oil shock. If they had led to devastating recessions, why would not the biggest oil shock of them all, be the obvious culprit for what has been the deepest recession to date?



The problem is not so much Peak Oil but Peak Cheap Oil.  Oil will simply become too expensive to fuel the global economy before it becomes too scarce.   One of the first casualties will be the globalized economy and Rubin explains we have already seen the beginning of the end of globalization and economies will have to adapt to the new reality.



So how do we adapt? How do we grow in an economy of triple digit oil prices? We change the nature of our economy. In a world of triple-digit oil prices, distance costs money. The global economy, where we produce one thing at one end of the world, to be sold at the other end of the world, doesn't make any economic sense, because in too many cases, what will be penny-wise, will soon become pound-foolish. The wage "arb", what we save on wages, we will more than squander on bunker fuel.


Take the steel industry, for example. Just before the recent recession, some very curious things were happening in the US market. When oil prices got to be over $100 barrel, all of the sudden, Chinese steel exports to the US fell at double-digit rates. And all of the sudden, US steel production was up. And all of the sudden, US Steel Corp., which was one of the biggest dogs in the market, all of the sudden its share price doubled.


What was going on? I'll tell you what was going on. For the first time in 20 years, it was cheaper to make steel in the United States than to import it from China. Why? Consider what China has to do to send you steel. First, it has to ship iron ore from Brazil, across the Pacific Ocean, turn it into steel, which is itself a very energy-intensive process, then ship it back, across the Pacific Ocean, to you. At $20 barrel, that works. At $100 barrel, that doesn't work. It added on $60 to $70 dollars, to the cost of a ton of hot-rolled steel. How much labor time do you think there is in making steel these days? One and a half to two hours. The transit costs all of a sudden exceeded the labor costs. Who would dream that triple digit oil prices would breathe new life into our hollowed-out Rust Belt? But in a world where distance costs money, that is exactly what is going to happen.



And what about all that food we now import from China?



Last year, China exported $6 billion of food to America, everything from apples to frozen chicken wings, bringing a whole new meaning to having your Chinese food delivered. Steel doesn't have to be refrigerated. Hopefully, frozen chicken wings do. What do you think powers that refrigeration unit? Bunker fuel! The same thing that is powering the boat. The world of triple digit oil prices--it won't matter that farm labor is cheaper in China than in the United States, because the cost of bringing those frozen chicken wings to us will be too expensive.



And here Rubin really sounds like Kunstler six years ago:



it's not like we are going to stop using steel in America, and it is certainly not like we are going to stop eating. What we are going to have to do is make our own steel. What we are going to have to do is grow more of our own food. Unfortunately, much of our agricultural land has been paved over with suburban sprawl. Just as triple digit oil prices will breathe new life into our hollowed out Rust Belt, triple digit oil prices will turn those far-flung suburbs and exurbs back into the farmland they were, thirty to forty years ago. The very same economic forces that gutted our manufacturing sector, that paved over our farm land, when oil was cheap and abundant, and transport costs were incidental, those same economic forces will do the opposite in a world of triple digit oil prices. And that is not determined by government, and that is not determined by ideological preference, and that is not determined by our willingness or unwillingness to reduce our carbon trail. That is just Economics 100.



Unfortunately those in power - both Democrats and Republicans - didn't learn much in Economics 100 and don't see the writing on the wall.  They are still listening to the huge multinational corporations who are on the verge of extinction as economies become increasingly local out of necessity.


 



5 comments:

  1. How we handle the changing food web is of great interest to me. In most places, people are starting to build serious, parallel institutions. Unfortunately, farming is quite difficult...even more difficult, financially, to be a full-time small farmer. The US regulatory framework is also stacked against the kind of food production we'll need.
    But my big worry is in the suburbs. Most of the outer suburbs developed over the last 20 years or so were built on farmland. It isn't farmland anymore. The sort of soil good for growing crops is not very good for building on, so the SOP is generally to scrape the good soil, replace it with fill dirt and then build. With most new construction, there's just enough soil to grow turf. Most of that old farmland is gone forever (well, not quite but four our purposes it is).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lex
    New paradigms rarely come easily. The reality is we are going to experience a Joseph Tainter collapse and millions of people will die. Some will die of starvation, some from disease and some in conflicts over remaining resources. Some countries will fair better and some regions within those countries will fair better than others. There won't be enough food for everyone alive today. If we had started planning for this 40 or 50 years ago this transition would have been less painful but we didn't. History tells us that's the way it usually plays out. The Dark Ages were followed by the Renaissance, if the human race is lucky it will play out like that again.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ron,
    I don't disagree one bit. The United States in particular is not at all prepared for the massive changes it will soon have to make. It's going to be very ugly. The closest comparison point for the US would be the collapse of the Soviet Union, but the US is far less prepared for a situation like that than the Russian people were.
    And this, of course, is likely to be compounded by the trouble not being isolated in the United States.
    Unfortunately, about all any of us can do is to prepare individually and at the local level. There's a reason i live where i live (next to the biggest tub of fresh water on the planet, far from "civilization" and surrounded by trees - building material and fuel - and live the lifestyle that i live. One grid at a time, and hope that you're off enough of them by the time comes so that the pain will be mitigated by preparedness.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It takes less fossil fuel to carry a container across the pacific than to carry it a few hundred km by truck.
    Peak oil won't kill global trade.
    It will kill inland cities that cannot be reached by water or rail.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The operative word there Curmudgeon, is rail - another one of Kunstler's pets. Most of the right of way, road grading, tunnels, etc is still there, just waiting for new trackage.

    ReplyDelete