Farewell. The Flying Pig Has Left The Building.

Steve Hynd, August 16, 2012

After four years on the Typepad site, eight years total blogging, Newshoggers is closing it's doors today. We've been coasting the last year or so, with many of us moving on to bigger projects (Hey, Eric!) or simply running out of blogging enthusiasm, and it's time to give the old flying pig a rest.

We've done okay over those eight years, although never being quite PC enough to gain wider acceptance from the partisan "party right or wrong" crowds. We like to think we moved political conversations a little, on the ever-present wish to rush to war with Iran, on the need for a real Left that isn't licking corporatist Dem boots every cycle, on America's foreign misadventures in Afghanistan and Iraq. We like to think we made a small difference while writing under that flying pig banner. We did pretty good for a bunch with no ties to big-party apparatuses or think tanks.

Those eight years of blogging will still exist. Because we're ending this typepad account, we've been archiving the typepad blog here. And the original blogger archive is still here. There will still be new content from the old 'hoggers crew too. Ron writes for The Moderate Voice, I post at The Agonist and Eric Martin's lucid foreign policy thoughts can be read at Democracy Arsenal.

I'd like to thank all our regular commenters, readers and the other bloggers who regularly linked to our posts over the years to agree or disagree. You all made writing for 'hoggers an amazingly fun and stimulating experience.

Thank you very much.

Note: This is an archive copy of Newshoggers. Most of the pictures are gone but the words are all here. There may be some occasional new content, John may do some posts and Ron will cross post some of his contributions to The Moderate Voice so check back.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Between a rock and a hard place

Commentary By Ron Beasley�


What do you do when your base wants to cut the budget but really doesn't want to cut anything?  That is the problem faced by the Republicans.  As I have said before if you are serious about balancing the budget you have to either slash defense spending and Medicare or raise taxes.  Now the base won't stand for either and the military industrial complex will fight defense cuts and the medical industrial complex will fight Medicare cuts and everyone will oppose tax increases.  The headline reads:


Tea Party Shows Its Muscle as G.O.P. Seeks More Savings



WASHINGTON � House Republican leaders said on Thursday that they would accede to demands from conservatives and dig deeper into the federal budget for billions of dollars in additional savings this year, exhibiting the power of the Tea Party movement and increasing chances of a major fiscal clash with Democrats.


In response to complaints from rank-and-file Republicans that the party was not fulfilling a campaign promise to roll back domestic spending this year by $100 billion, the chairman of the House Appropriations Committee said his panel would abandon its initial plan and draw up a new one to slice spending more aggressively.



Of course 100 billion dollars is petty cash when it come to the federal budget. It is less than we are spending in Afghanistan every year.


But another poll today shows the real problem the Republicans face is that few actually want to cut anything that really matters.


Fewer Want Spending to Grow, But Most Cuts Remain Unpopular



The public�s views about federal spending are beginning to change. Across a range of federal programs, Americans are no longer calling for increased spending, as they have for many years. For the most part, however, there is not a great deal of support for cutting spending, though in a few cases support for reductions has grown noticeably. The survey also shows that the public is reluctant to cut spending � or raise taxes � to balance state budgets.



Those who want to decrease Medicare is at 12%, an increase from 6% a year ago but still pretty anemic.  We see a larger increase in those in favor of cuts to defense spending, 30% today, 18% a year ago.


Bottom line, the Republicans find themselves in a position where they are damned if they do and damned if they don't - between a rock and a hard place. 



2 comments:

  1. The GOP promised to cut $100 billion in spending.
    We're spending more than $100 billion a year on Afghanistan.
    AQ's moved to Yemen, and our greatest threat, according to Napolitano, is from home-grown terrorists.
    Sounds like a no-brainer to me. Withdraw from Afghanistan.
    Then, neglecting to mention the $1 trillion you've already wasted there, take credit for $1 trillion in savings over the next ten years.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not quite everyone opposes tax increases. I'd like to see taxes go up, and wouldn't complain if my own went up, as long as it's steeply progressive.
    Left unsaid in most deficit conversations: (a) most Americans don't really care about the deficit, and (b) most Americans DO care about unemployment, which would get drastically worse if we actually fixed the deficit in the short run.

    ReplyDelete